W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamc@w3.org > July 2006

Please review proposals for last call issues 678 and 679, discussion on 680 and 695

From: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:25:22 -0500
To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF865EFE83.C597716F-ON862571B7.007FCF4E-862571B7.0080AA9D@us.ibm.com>

I didn't reach my goal of 5 more proposals for today but I did manage to do
two more: 678 [1] and 679 [2].

I also took a look at 680 [3] and 695 [4]. I would like to discuss these on
Monday if we have time before attempting to make proposals on them.

In 680, Chris Ridpath is questioning why summary attributes on layout
tables can only be null. He suggests that summary attributes on the top
level layout table can be useful. Does anyone have an opinion or experience
with this?

In 695, Chris recommends that we should not recommend the use of the Q
element because IE does not support it. What should we do about this one?

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/678
[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/679
[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/680
[4] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/695

Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 23:25:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:55:39 UTC