- From: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:25:22 -0500
- To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
I didn't reach my goal of 5 more proposals for today but I did manage to do two more: 678 [1] and 679 [2]. I also took a look at 680 [3] and 695 [4]. I would like to discuss these on Monday if we have time before attempting to make proposals on them. In 680, Chris Ridpath is questioning why summary attributes on layout tables can only be null. He suggests that summary attributes on the top level layout table can be useful. Does anyone have an opinion or experience with this? In 695, Chris recommends that we should not recommend the use of the Q element because IE does not support it. What should we do about this one? [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/678 [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/679 [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/680 [4] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/695 Andi
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 23:25:35 UTC