RE: Action item: Proposed wording for SC 1.3.1 (long)

John, this looks like a definition of presentation. Are there changes to
the SC that would take advantage of it?

Loretta Guarino Reid
lguarino@adobe.com
Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org [mailto:public-
> wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John M Slatin
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 8:22 AM
> To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
> Subject: Action item: Proposed wording for SC 1.3.1 (long)
> 
> 
> Hello, Team B. Thanks again for all the good work these
> past few weeks--
> special thanks to Loretta for her work in keeping our
> status page up to
> date and to everyone for thinking things through, making
> updates, and
> helping to sort things out. We're getting closer and
> closer to our goal!
> 
> A big item: on yesterday's call, Team B was asked to re-
> examine SC 1.3.1
> and propose new wording for it. This has been one of the
> most difficult
> and controversial-- and one of the most important-- SC in
> the
> Guidelines. And it's still not quite right!
> 
> Please consider the following proposal. It presents
> proposed wording for
> the SC, together with definitions of some key terms and a
> rationale. Try
> to break it-- where are the holes in the wording, logic,
> etc.? And if
> you find any holes, please propose alternative wording
> that would fill
> the gaps.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> <beginProposal>
> Presentation is the rendering of the content and structure
> in a form
> that can be perceived by the user.
> </endProposal>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Good design is accessible design."
> John Slatin, Ph.D.
> Director, Accessibility Institute
> University of Texas at Austin
> FAC 248C
> 1 University Station G9600
> Austin, TX 78712
> ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
> email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
> web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 3 March 2006 18:17:29 UTC