- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:21:41 -0600
- To: <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
Hello, Team B. Thanks again for all the good work these past few weeks-- special thanks to Loretta for her work in keeping our status page up to date and to everyone for thinking things through, making updates, and helping to sort things out. We're getting closer and closer to our goal! A big item: on yesterday's call, Team B was asked to re-examine SC 1.3.1 and propose new wording for it. This has been one of the most difficult and controversial-- and one of the most important-- SC in the Guidelines. And it's still not quite right! Please consider the following proposal. It presents proposed wording for the SC, together with definitions of some key terms and a rationale. Try to break it-- where are the holes in the wording, logic, etc.? And if you find any holes, please propose alternative wording that would fill the gaps. Thanks! <beginProposal> Presentation is the rendering of the content and structure in a form that can be perceived by the user. </endProposal> "Good design is accessible design." John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/
Received on Friday, 3 March 2006 16:21:52 UTC