- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:56:55 -0600
- To: <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
Becky, Sorry I didn't respond sooner. Thanks for this technique. A couple of suggestions: 1. I think the test for determining when link text has to be supplemented would be something like: ===Procedure=== #Check for any links with identical link text (including identical alt text for graphical links) #For each link identified in (1), check that the value of the href attribute is unique #For each link with identical link text (including alt text for graphical links) and a unique href attribute, check that a title attribute is present and that the title attribute describes the destination of the link ===Expected result=== (3) Is true 2. I think the example and test about the link opening in a new window can be deleted-- these are more appropriate for GL3.2 since they're about changes of context. I know the test I proposed above is long and that the items are hard to read. Hopefully someone can come up with a shorter way to say those things! John ===Expected results=== "Good design is accessible design." John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/
Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 21:56:59 UTC