- From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:26:57 +0100
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Cc: public-wcag-teama@w3.org
Hi Gregg, > At the last WG meeting the WG decided to not define FOCUS because it > actually has different meanings in different places. Also, people know what > it means that can do something about this. > > It was felt that there was a problem with people reading fast and mistaking > "receives focus" with focus. So in the Guide doc we can just put a note to > clarify this and it would be more effective than two definitions that the > user would have to decipher and integrate to get the same conclusion. > > Make sense to you? If not give me a buzz. Yes, that all makes sense. Is the guide doc as it stands [1] clear about the difference between "focus" and "receives focus", or will this need adding before it goes to survey with the main group? [1] http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Guide_to_3.2_L1_SC1 Best regards, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 09:27:32 UTC