Re: Action Item Bug: 1568

Hi Gregg,

> At the last WG meeting the WG decided to not define FOCUS because it
> actually has different meanings in different places.  Also, people know what
> it means that can do something about this.
>
> It was felt that there was a problem with people reading fast and mistaking
> "receives focus" with focus.   So in the Guide doc we can just put a note to
> clarify this and it would be more effective than two definitions that the
> user would have to decipher and integrate to get the same conclusion.
>
> Make sense to you?  If not give me a buzz.

Yes, that all makes sense. Is the guide doc as it stands [1] clear
about the difference between "focus" and "receives focus", or will
this need adding before it goes to survey with the main group?

[1] http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Guide_to_3.2_L1_SC1

Best regards,

Gez

--
_____________________________
Supplement your vitamins
http://juicystudio.com

Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 09:27:32 UTC