- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:56:29 +0200
- To: public-wcag-teama@w3.org
At 11:26 5/10/2005, Gez Lemon wrote: >Hi Gregg, > > > At the last WG meeting the WG decided to not define FOCUS because it > > actually has different meanings in different places. Also, people know > what > > it means that can do something about this. > > > > It was felt that there was a problem with people reading fast and mistaking > > "receives focus" with focus. So in the Guide doc we can just put a > note to > > clarify this and it would be more effective than two definitions that the > > user would have to decipher and integrate to get the same conclusion. > > > > Make sense to you? If not give me a buzz. > >Yes, that all makes sense. Is the guide doc as it stands [1] clear >about the difference between "focus" and "receives focus", or will >this need adding before it goes to survey with the main group? I think it looks good. You could also write: "If a component is able to trigger/fire an event when it receives focus, this event should not be handled in a way that causes a change of context." This is very precise, but maybe it only makes sense to developers. Regards, Christophe Strbbe >[1] http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Guide_to_3.2_L1_SC1 > >Best regards, > >Gez -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 09:57:45 UTC