Re: Action Item Bug: 1568

At 11:26 5/10/2005, Gez Lemon wrote:
>Hi Gregg,
>
> > At the last WG meeting the WG decided to not define FOCUS because it
> > actually has different meanings in different places.  Also, people know 
> what
> > it means that can do something about this.
> >
> > It was felt that there was a problem with people reading fast and mistaking
> > "receives focus" with focus.   So in the Guide doc we can just put a 
> note to
> > clarify this and it would be more effective than two definitions that the
> > user would have to decipher and integrate to get the same conclusion.
> >
> > Make sense to you?  If not give me a buzz.
>
>Yes, that all makes sense. Is the guide doc as it stands [1] clear
>about the difference between "focus" and "receives focus", or will
>this need adding before it goes to survey with the main group?

I think it looks good. You could also write:
"If a component is able to trigger/fire an event when it receives focus,
this event should not be handled in a way that causes a change of context."
This is very precise, but maybe it only makes sense to developers.

Regards,

Christophe Strbbe


>[1] http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Guide_to_3.2_L1_SC1
>
>Best regards,
>
>Gez

-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm

Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 09:57:45 UTC