[wbs] response to 'Approval for draft publication of WCAG-EM'

The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Approval for
draft publication of WCAG-EM' (public) for Yod Samuel Martin.


---------------------------------
Abstract
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments have been posted to the WCAG-EM comments mailing list. 
They are archived at
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html>

Specifically, comment #1
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.jlift3cap8ye>
applies to the Abstract with strong priority (to be addressed before
publication). That comment is aligned to comments already provided by other
respondants.


---------------------------------
Introduction
----



 * (x) accept this section as draft
 * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments to the Introduction are available at
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.cwp3pfb1yttc>
, they are all minor comments that can be addressed after the publication
of the Working Draft.


---------------------------------
Using This Methodology
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Comment #7 applies to this section with moderate priority
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.40et18ysw45p>
(regarding the use of "aging-related impairments") 


---------------------------------
Scope of Applicability
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments applicable to this section are archived here
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.mwt6lvp69oth>,
although some of them are prioritary, they are deemed to be addressed after
the publication of the Working Draft, **except for these**

Comment #14
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.alic0avy866s>
(on black-box testing) and comment #15
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.m3f6msx8kffh>
(on conflicting use of third-party contents) should be addressed before
publication, with strong priority.


---------------------------------
Step 1: Define the Evaluation Scope
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments applicable to this section are archived here 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.be0hmyad5e5u>although
some of them are prioritary, they are deemed to be addressed after the
publication of the Working Draft, **except for this**

Comment #20
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.sjtc6q7p3chn>
should be addressed before the publication of the Working Draft: the
comment is indeed asking for public feedback on Step 1.c, so it can only be
either honoured or dismissed before the draft is published.


---------------------------------
Step 2: Explore the Target Website
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments to Step 2 are available at
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.9w3za3bx0cyg>
, even though some comments are moderately prioritary, they can all be
addressed after the publication of the Working Draft.


---------------------------------
Step 3: Select a Representative Sample
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments to Step 3 are available at
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.8tw4knxsa4r2>
, even though some comments are moderately prioritary, they can all be
addressed after the publication of the Working Draft.


---------------------------------
Step 4: Audit the Selected Sample
----



 * (x) accept this section as draft
 * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 


---------------------------------
Step 5: Record the Evaluation Findings
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * (x) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments to Step 3 are available at
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.q1cxdi3kjojx>
Some of the comments can be addressed after the publication of the Working
Draft. However, **these are deemed to be dealt with before** with strong
priority:

Comment #37
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.wp2xh6l2zmlj>
(on requiring a mention to the scoring procedure if a score is provided)

Comment #39
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.fat2qngbwagt>
(unclear wording for the procedure to compute per web page score)

Comment #41
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.ipi41u4q10hp>
on conflicting use of the reference to applicability of Success Criteria

Comment #42
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.lglkt0yidzbc>
on discouraging the use of scores for comparisons among websites (this is
an editorial change, anyway).

Comment #43
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.pcficqc6p0u>
on keeping the request for public feedback regarding scoring.

Comment #44
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.1u3ruz2iffek>
also has strong priority, but due to its complexity, I understand it cannot
be addressed before publication as a Working Draft, and it is subsumed
under the general discussion regarding scoring.

These answers were last modified on 15 December 2013 at 21:49:48 U.T.C.
by Yod Samuel Martin

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/WCAG-EM-20131129/ until 2013-12-17.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Sunday, 15 December 2013 21:51:02 UTC