- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of samuelm@dit.upm.es <webmaster@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:57:01 +0000
- To: samuelm@dit.upm.es,public-wcag-em-comments@w3.org,shadi@w3.org,e.velleman@accessibility.nl
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Approval for draft publication of WCAG-EM' (public) for Yod Samuel Martin. --------------------------------- Abstract ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) Detailed comments have been posted to the WCAG-EM comments mailing list. They are archived at <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html> Specifically, comment #1 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.jlift3cap8ye> applies to the Abstract with strong priority (to be addressed before publication). That comment is aligned to comments already provided by other respondants. --------------------------------- Introduction ---- * (x) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) Detailed comments to the Introduction are available at <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.cwp3pfb1yttc> , they are all minor comments that can be addressed after the publication of the Working Draft. --------------------------------- Using This Methodology ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) Comment #7 archived online applies to this section with moderate priority <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.40et18ysw45p> (regarding the use of "aging-related impairments") --------------------------------- Scope of Applicability ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) Detailed comments applicable to this section are archived here <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.mwt6lvp69oth>, although some of them are prioritary, they are deemed to be addressed after the publication of the Working Draft, **except for these**, which should be addressed before publication, with strong priority. - Comment #14 (on black-box testing) <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.alic0avy866s> - Comment #15 (on conflicting use of third-party contents) <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.m3f6msx8kffh> --------------------------------- Step 1: Define the Evaluation Scope ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) Detailed comments applicable to this section are archived here <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.be0hmyad5e5u>although some of them are prioritary, they are deemed to be addressed after the publication of the Working Draft, **except for this**, which should be addressed before the publication of the Working Draft: - Comment #20 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.sjtc6q7p3chn> : the comment is indeed asking for public feedback on Step 1.c, so it can only be either honoured or dismissed before the draft is published. --------------------------------- Step 2: Explore the Target Website ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) Detailed comments to Step 2 are available at <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.9w3za3bx0cyg> , even though some comments are moderately prioritary, they can all be addressed after the publication of the Working Draft. --------------------------------- Step 3: Select a Representative Sample ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) Detailed comments to Step 3 are available at <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.8tw4knxsa4r2> , even though some comments are moderately prioritary, they can all be addressed after the publication of the Working Draft. --------------------------------- Step 4: Audit the Selected Sample ---- * (x) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Step 5: Record the Evaluation Findings ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * (x) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) Detailed comments to Step 3 are available at <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.q1cxdi3kjojx> Some of the comments can be addressed after the publication of the Working Draft. However, **these are deemed to be dealt with before** with strong priority: - Comment #37 (on requiring a mention to the scoring procedure if a score is provided) <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.wp2xh6l2zmlj> - Comment #39 (unclear wording for the procedure to compute per web page score) <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.fat2qngbwagt> - Comment #41 (on conflicting usage of the terms referring to applicability of Success Criteria <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.ipi41u4q10hp> - Comment #42 (on discouraging the use of scores for comparisons among websites this is an editorial change, anyway) <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.lglkt0yidzbc> - Comment #43 (on keeping the request for public feedback regarding scoring) <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.pcficqc6p0u> - Comment #44 also has strong priority, but due to its complexity, I understand it cannot be addressed before publication as a Working Draft, and it is subsumed under the general discussion regarding scoring. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.1u3ruz2iffek> These answers were last modified on 15 December 2013 at 21:56:50 U.T.C. by Yod Samuel Martin Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/WCAG-EM-20131129/ until 2013-12-17. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Sunday, 15 December 2013 21:57:02 UTC