W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-em-comments@w3.org > December 2013

[wbs] response to 'Approval for draft publication of WCAG-EM'

From: WBS Mailer on behalf of samuelm@dit.upm.es <webmaster@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:57:01 +0000
To: samuelm@dit.upm.es,public-wcag-em-comments@w3.org,shadi@w3.org,e.velleman@accessibility.nl
Message-Id: <wbs-f6f489350734f13c7048133dafcd6a12@cgi.w3.org>
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Approval for
draft publication of WCAG-EM' (public) for Yod Samuel Martin.


---------------------------------
Abstract
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments have been posted to the WCAG-EM comments mailing list. 
They are archived at
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html>

Specifically, comment #1
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.jlift3cap8ye>
applies to the Abstract with strong priority (to be addressed before
publication). That comment is aligned to comments already provided by other
respondants.


---------------------------------
Introduction
----



 * (x) accept this section as draft
 * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments to the Introduction are available at
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.cwp3pfb1yttc>
, they are all minor comments that can be addressed after the publication
of the Working Draft.


---------------------------------
Using This Methodology
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Comment #7 archived online applies to this section with moderate priority
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.40et18ysw45p>
(regarding the use of "aging-related impairments") 


---------------------------------
Scope of Applicability
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments applicable to this section are archived here
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.mwt6lvp69oth>,
although some of them are prioritary, they are deemed to be addressed after
the publication of the Working Draft, **except for these**, which should be
addressed before publication, with strong priority.

- Comment #14 (on black-box testing) 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.alic0avy866s>

- Comment #15 (on conflicting use of third-party contents)
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.m3f6msx8kffh>
 


---------------------------------
Step 1: Define the Evaluation Scope
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments applicable to this section are archived here 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.be0hmyad5e5u>although
some of them are prioritary, they are deemed to be addressed after the
publication of the Working Draft, **except for this**, which should be
addressed before the publication of the Working Draft:

- Comment #20
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.sjtc6q7p3chn>
: the comment is indeed asking for public feedback on Step 1.c, so it can
only be either honoured or dismissed before the draft is published.


---------------------------------
Step 2: Explore the Target Website
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments to Step 2 are available at
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.9w3za3bx0cyg>
, even though some comments are moderately prioritary, they can all be
addressed after the publication of the Working Draft.


---------------------------------
Step 3: Select a Representative Sample
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments to Step 3 are available at
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.8tw4knxsa4r2>
, even though some comments are moderately prioritary, they can all be
addressed after the publication of the Working Draft.


---------------------------------
Step 4: Audit the Selected Sample
----



 * (x) accept this section as draft
 * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 


---------------------------------
Step 5: Record the Evaluation Findings
----



 * ( ) accept this section as draft
 * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions
 * (x) I do not accept this section as draft
 * ( ) I abstain (not vote)
 Detailed comments to Step 3 are available at
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.q1cxdi3kjojx>
Some of the comments can be addressed after the publication of the Working
Draft. However, **these are deemed to be dealt with before** with strong
priority:

- Comment #37 (on requiring a mention to the scoring procedure if a score
is provided)
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.wp2xh6l2zmlj>


- Comment #39 (unclear wording for the procedure to compute per web page
score)
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.fat2qngbwagt>

- Comment #41 (on conflicting usage of the terms referring to applicability
of Success Criteria
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.ipi41u4q10hp>

- Comment #42 (on discouraging the use of scores for comparisons among
websites this is an editorial change, anyway)
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.lglkt0yidzbc>

- Comment #43 (on keeping the request for public feedback regarding
scoring)
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.pcficqc6p0u>

- Comment #44 also has strong priority, but due to its complexity, I
understand it cannot be addressed before publication as a Working Draft,
and it is subsumed under the general discussion regarding scoring.
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2013Dec/att-0065/CommentstoWCAGEMEditorsDraft29November2013.html#h.1u3ruz2iffek>

These answers were last modified on 15 December 2013 at 21:56:50 U.T.C.
by Yod Samuel Martin

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/WCAG-EM-20131129/ until 2013-12-17.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Sunday, 15 December 2013 21:57:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:55:24 UTC