RE: EvalTF New ED for review

I love the new graphic!!

 

Katie

 

From: Moe Kraft [mailto:maureen_kraft@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:46 AM
To: evelleman@bartimeus.nl
Cc: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Subject: Re: EvalTF New ED for review

 

Hi Eric, 

I really like the new graphic. My only critique is that it is too big in
proportion to the rest of the document. It barely fits in the browser window
and I need to zoom out to see any surrounding text. When I do this however
the surrounding text is too small. 



Can we use the Example of a Website graphic as a guide to font and graphic
size? I think that graphic is appropriately proportioned. 

Thanks, 
Moe 


  _____  


 <http://www.ibm.com/able> 

Maureen Kraft
Accessibility Consultant Test Lead 
Human Ability and Accessibility Center 
IBM Research 

Tel: 978-899-3114
E-mail: maureen_kraft@us.ibm.com 

	  



						
			
			






From:        "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl> 
To:        "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>, 
Date:        02/19/2013 08:36 AM 
Subject:        EvalTF New ED for review 

  _____  




Dear EvalTF,

We have made the changes as discussed in our last telco. Also as a result of
the discussion in the WCAG WG last week we included some extra edits and
changes covering a number of their comments. Please find below the links to
the new Editor Draft, and also to an extra DoC for the WCAG WG comments made
last week.

Let the list know if you object to the changes we made to accommodate the
objections from WCAG WG. Also please have a look at the new diagram (many
thanks to Kathy). We will have more time to discuss once we publish the new
Public Working Draft.

We will discuss this version in the ERT meeting, our own telco on thursday
and in the WCAG WG telco. Hope we can then publish after thursday.

Documents:
1. New ED: < <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130219>
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130219>
2. Explanation of changes in extra DoC: <
<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20130208>
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20130208>
3. Diff version: <
<http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fc
onformance%2FED-methodology-20130208&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER
%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20130219>
http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fco
nformance%2FED-methodology-20130208&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%
2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20130219>

Kindest regards,

Eric Velleman