Re: EvalTF New ED for review

Hi Shadi, 

Thanks. It's still quite large on this end. One thing I can do is to 
update the Firefox zoom settings to zoom the text only but then the other 
image, Example of a Website, remains fairly small. If we could scale the 
new process image similar to the Example of a Website image, that would be 
best. 

Unfortunately, I have a very high resolution display and when I am at 
default browser zoom level, the text font appears about 6 pt as compared 
to a 6 pt font in a word document on the same machine.

Comparing the dimensions of the two images, I have 1547 x 880 pixels vs. 
577 x 244 pixels.  Almost 3x as big.
Not sure how these will come through but here's the difference in size I 
see on my machine. 


Thanks again, 
Moe


Maureen Kraft
Accessibility Consultant Test Lead
Human Ability and Accessibility Center 
IBM Research 

Tel: 978-899-3114
E-mail: maureen_kraft@us.ibm.com 


 

















From:   Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
To:     Moe Kraft <maureen_kraft@us.ibm.com>, 
Cc:     evelleman@bartimeus.nl, "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" 
<public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Date:   02/21/2013 09:13 AM
Subject:        Re: EvalTF New ED for review



Hi Moe,

I've limited the size in the latest Editor Draft:
  - http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130219

I'll check with Kathy about rescaling it as well.

Best,
   Shadi


On 21.2.2013 13:45, Moe Kraft wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I really like the new graphic. My only critique is that it is too big in
> proportion to the rest of the document. It barely fits in the browser
> window and I need to zoom out to see any surrounding text. When I do 
this
> however the surrounding text is too small.
>
>
>
> Can we use the Example of a Website graphic as a guide to font and 
graphic
> size? I think that graphic is appropriately proportioned.
>
> Thanks,
> Moe
>
>
>
> Maureen Kraft
> Accessibility Consultant Test Lead
> Human Ability and Accessibility Center
> IBM Research
>
> Tel: 978-899-3114
> E-mail: maureen_kraft@us.ibm.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:   "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
> To:     "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>,
> Date:   02/19/2013 08:36 AM
> Subject:        EvalTF New ED for review
>
>
>
> Dear EvalTF,
>
> We have made the changes as discussed in our last telco. Also as a 
result
> of the discussion in the WCAG WG last week we included some extra edits
> and changes covering a number of their comments. Please find below the
> links to the new Editor Draft, and also to an extra DoC for the WCAG WG
> comments made last week.
>
> Let the list know if you object to the changes we made to accommodate 
the
> objections from WCAG WG. Also please have a look at the new diagram 
(many
> thanks to Kathy). We will have more time to discuss once we publish the
> new Public Working Draft.
>
> We will discuss this version in the ERT meeting, our own telco on 
thursday
> and in the WCAG WG telco. Hope we can then publish after thursday.
>
> Documents:
> 1. New ED: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130219
>
> 2. Explanation of changes in extra DoC: <
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20130208>
> 3. Diff version: <
> 
http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20130208&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20130219

>>
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Eric Velleman
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)