Hi Eric,
I really like the new graphic. My only critique is that it is too big in
proportion to the rest of the document. It barely fits in the browser
window and I need to zoom out to see any surrounding text. When I do this
however the surrounding text is too small.
Can we use the Example of a Website graphic as a guide to font and graphic
size? I think that graphic is appropriately proportioned.
Thanks,
Moe
Maureen Kraft
Accessibility Consultant Test Lead
Human Ability and Accessibility Center
IBM Research
Tel: 978-899-3114
E-mail: maureen_kraft@us.ibm.com
From: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
To: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>,
Date: 02/19/2013 08:36 AM
Subject: EvalTF New ED for review
Dear EvalTF,
We have made the changes as discussed in our last telco. Also as a result
of the discussion in the WCAG WG last week we included some extra edits
and changes covering a number of their comments. Please find below the
links to the new Editor Draft, and also to an extra DoC for the WCAG WG
comments made last week.
Let the list know if you object to the changes we made to accommodate the
objections from WCAG WG. Also please have a look at the new diagram (many
thanks to Kathy). We will have more time to discuss once we publish the
new Public Working Draft.
We will discuss this version in the ERT meeting, our own telco on thursday
and in the WCAG WG telco. Hope we can then publish after thursday.
Documents:
1. New ED: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130219>
2. Explanation of changes in extra DoC: <
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20130208>
3. Diff version: <
http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20130208&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20130219
>
Kindest regards,
Eric Velleman
