- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:36:21 +0200
- To: RichardWarren <richard.warren@userite.com>
- CC: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Richard, Thank you for this feedback. I hope this is better addressed in the latest draft circulated in a separate thread with Gregg and WCAG WG. Best, Shadi On 13.9.2012 02:08, RichardWarren wrote: > Hi, > > Section 3.4.2 (step 4b) is part of the actual evaluation (testing) of > the selected pages/sections of the web-site. > In effect we are saying that if the designer has used "applicable WCAG > 2.0 techniques" *correctly* then that is sufficient for the evaluator to > say that the particular success criteria has been met. For example; if > all the <img> elements contain an alt="value" attribute with appropriate > values, (G94) - then, that in itself, is sufficient to claim conformance > with Guideline 1.1 for those images. The evaluator does not need to do > any further testing on this issue. Bear in mind that if a technique is > not used it does not automatically mean a failure - there may be another > method which would need to be tested to see if it works in all > situations. The important thing is that, *if* the appropriate WCAG > techniques has been correctly applied, then there is no need for further > testing because WCAG has already done all the required testing. > > I suggest that the title of the proposed rewrite be made clearer as > given below. > > Current text:- > 3.4.2 Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible (Optional) > Methodology Requirement 4.b: Where possible, use applicable WCAG 2.0 > techniques to demonstrate successes and failures in meeting the WCAG 2.0 > Success Criteria relevant per 3.1.3 Step 1.c: Define the Conformance > Target. > > Proposed text:- > 3.4.2 Step 4.b: Identify the use of appropriate WCAG 2.0 Techniques > Where Possible (Optional) > Methodology Requirement 4.b: Where possible, identify the correct use of > applicable WCAG 2.0 techniques to demonstrate successes in meeting the > WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria relevant per 3.1.3 Step 1.c: Define the > Conformance Target. > > > Regards > > Richard > > -----Original Message----- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 9:22 PM > To: WCAG WG ; Eval TF > Subject: [input requested] 3.4.2 Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where > Possible (Optional) > > Dear WCAG WG, Eval TF, > > We currently have one comment open for discussion, on section 3.4.2 Step > 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible (Optional). > > Attached are suggested edits by Gregg Vanderheiden (Document1.doc) and > the proposed rewrite in response (Step4b_SAZ2.odc) which also contains > important discussion in the commentary. > > Your input on this is needed. Basically we need to be accurate and avoid > potential misunderstandings. On the other hand, we also need to offer > real guidance that is also easy to understand and follow. > > Regards, > Shadi > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2012 13:36:55 UTC