- From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:23:39 -0400
- To: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
I like WAEM - it is directly derived from the title, so there can be no ambiguity in mapping from the title to the acronym.. if a different acronym is used confusion and unintended meanings/nuances different from the title may be introduced..? Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland -----Original Message----- From: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Velleman, Eric Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 11:11 AM To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org Subject: Short name for Methodology Dear all, We decided in the call to discuss the short name in the list. Below are some short names from the discussions we had sofar and a proposed shortlist of requirements: Requirements for a short name: - It should be short - Easy to pronounce - Clear to all what it means (selfexplanatory) - Be about the methodology Shortnames (Make your choice or add new ones): - SiteAccess - WCAG-Method - WCAG-EM - WAEM (really using the title) - WCAG-Check - AccessSite - WCAG-Site - AccessCheck - SiteCheck - CheckSite - WAMBAM - WAME - MCEWA - CEWA - CEW2WCAG2 - UWEM - SITE - MAWA - MDWC - EWAMAC - EMAWC - WEM Kindest regards, Eric
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 15:24:34 UTC