- From: Fong, Elizabeth N. <elizabeth.fong@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:15:06 -0400
- To: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
- CC: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
I like WAEM, It is really the title and it is easy to pronounce. --Liz -----Original Message----- From: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Velleman, Eric Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 11:11 AM To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org Subject: Short name for Methodology Dear all, We decided in the call to discuss the short name in the list. Below are some short names from the discussions we had sofar and a proposed shortlist of requirements: Requirements for a short name: - It should be short - Easy to pronounce - Clear to all what it means (selfexplanatory) - Be about the methodology Shortnames (Make your choice or add new ones): - SiteAccess - WCAG-Method - WCAG-EM - WAEM (really using the title) - WCAG-Check - AccessSite - WCAG-Site - AccessCheck - SiteCheck - CheckSite - WAMBAM - WAME - MCEWA - CEWA - CEW2WCAG2 - UWEM - SITE - MAWA - MDWC - EWAMAC - EMAWC - WEM Kindest regards, Eric
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 15:15:41 UTC