- From: Elle <nethermind@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 09:45:53 -0400
- To: Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com>
- Cc: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ=fddMWXNCbHD+Ph2San1UFyr0GttRKHY5Fw=ZDE_vH3Opwfg@mail.gmail.com>
Evaluation Methodology for Assessing Website Conformity to WCAG 2.0 is my vote. Cheers, Elle On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Denis Boudreau < dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com> wrote: > Or, based on the message from Amy I just saw, "Evaluation Methodology for > Assessing Website Accessibility Conformity to WCAG 2.0". > > And that would make the acronym "EMAWAC"... which, as everyone knows, means > "don't forget tool testing with real users" in Cherokee. ;p > > /Denis > > > On 2011-10-07, at 1:17 AM, Denis Boudreau wrote: > > > Same for "MAWC for WCAG 2.0". > > > > But maybe I'd prefer "Evaluation Methodology for Assessing Website > Conformity to WCAG 2.0". > > > > That would make the acronym "EMAWC". ;p > > > > /Denis > > > > > > > > On 2011-10-06, at 7:17 AM, Léonie Watson wrote: > > > >> "Methodology for Assessing Website Conformity to WCAG 2.0" is > clear, concise and usable. Gets my vote. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Léonie. > >> > >> -- > >> Nomensa - humanising technology > >> > >> Léonie Watson, Director of Accessibility & Web Development > >> > >> tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 > >> twitter: @we_are_Nomensa @LeonieWatson > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org [mailto: > public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shadi Abou-Zahra > >> Sent: 06 October 2011 06:18 > >> To: Eval TF > >> Subject: naming for "Methodology" > >> > >> Dear group, > >> > >> As trivial as it may sound it is time for us to think about a name for > the Methodology, so that we can start fleshing it out. > >> > >> Here are some brainstorms to get your creativity flowing: > >> > >> > >> # Favorites: > >> - Sampling, Inspection, and Technical Evaluation [of Websites for WCAG > 2.0] (SITE) ... especially when used in combination like "WCAG 2.0 SITE" > >> - Methodology for Assessing Website Conformity to WCAG 2.0 (MAC) > >> > >> > >> # Alternatives: > >> - Conformance Evaluation of Websites for Accessibility (CEWA or Conf) > >> - Accessibility Conformance Evaluation of Websites (ACEW) > >> - Conformance/Conformity Assessment Procedure (CAP) > >> - Conformance/Conformity Assessment Methodology (CAM) > >> - Website Accessibility Evaluation (WAE) > >> - Website Accessibility Assessment (WAA) > >> - Website Accessibility Methodology (WAM) > >> - Website Accessibility Assessment Procedure (WAAP) > >> - Website Accessibility Assessment Methodology (WAAM) > >> - Website Accessibility Evaluation Procedure (WAEP) > >> - Website Accessibility Evaluation Methodology (WAEM) > >> - Website Accessibility Inspection Procedure (WAIP) > >> - Website Accessibility Inspection Methodology (WAIM) > >> > >> > >> # Not serious: > >> - Conformance of Websites (CoW, WCAG-CoW, or WAI-CoW) > >> - Accessibility Conformance of Websites (A-CoW) > >> - Procedure for Accessibility Inspection (PAI like "pay") > >> - Procedure for Evaluation of Accessibility (PEA) > >> - Procedure for Evaluation of Accessibility Conformance (PEACe) > >> - Accessibility Evaluation of Websites (AEW) > >> - Harmonized Assessment Methodology (HAM) > >> - WCAG 2.0 Harmonized Assessment Methodology (WHAM) > >> - Website Conformance Assessment Guidelines (WCAG) > >> > >> > >> Best, > >> Shadi > >> > >> -- > >> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ > >> Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office > >> Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) > >> Research and Development Working Group (RDWG) > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- If you want to build a ship, don't drum up the people to gather wood, divide the work, and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea. - Antoine De Saint-Exupéry, The Little Prince
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 13:46:31 UTC