- From: <kvotis@iti.gr>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 09:39:32 +0300
- To: ssirois@accessibiliteweb.com
- Cc: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
I agree with Samuel that we should take into account Mobile Web. Also regarding the Websites i would prefer a more general naming e.g. Web applications?Regarding the acronym i could aslo suggest the acronym MEAC instead of MAC OR maybe MEAG (from WCAG) regards kostas > "Methodology for Assessing Website Conformity to WCAG 2.0" sounds good, > but maybe if we could change the word "Website" for "Web page" or "Web > pages", this later formulation could be instinctively more "global" for > everyone reading it? > > "Global" as in: Websites, Web applications and "mobile Websites" (as > some think that it is another "thing"). > > Samuel > > > On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 16:21 +0200, Kerstin Probiesch wrote: >> Methodology for Assessing Website Conformity to WCAG 2.0 > >
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 06:40:21 UTC