- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:12:36 +0200
- To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
ERT WG, Please review and respond to the following points by Friday 8 April: #1. Separating conformance/restrictions for vocabulary definitions - previous discussions: -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-er-minutes#item04> -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/04/06-er-minutes#item02> - more detailed explanation: -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Mar/0007> - questions to consider: -- can you live with conformance/restrictions moving out of the vocabulary definition documents, and into a more specific document? -- if so, what other guidance would go along with this guidance on conformance/restrictions for EARL tool developers? -- is it imaginable that the focus (and title, if needed) of the EARL Guide could shift to match the guidance we want to provide? References: - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues#conformance> - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-EARL10-Schema-20091029/#conformance> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/issues#conformance> - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-HTTP-in-RDF10-20091029/#conformance> #2. HTTP-in-RDF Message Header - previous discussion: -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-er-minutes#item05> - proposed solution: -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Mar/0008> - question to consider: do you accept the proposed solution? References: - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/issues#MessageClass> - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-HTTP-in-RDF10-20091029/#MessageClass> #3. HTTP-in-RDF PATCH Method - previous discussion: -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-er-minutes#item05> - proposed solution: -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Apr/0001> - question to consider: do you accept the proposed solution? References: - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/issues#MethodClass> - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-HTTP-in-RDF10-20091029/#MethodClass> #4. Proposed batch-resolutions - suggestions for resolutions to open comments: -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Mar/0010> - note: item #5 dct:identifier/status code will be handled separately - question to consider: do you accept the proposed solution? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2011 14:13:02 UTC