Re: For review by Friday 8 April 2011

El 06/04/2011 16:12, Shadi Abou-Zahra escribió:
> ERT WG,
>
> Please review and respond to the following points by Friday 8 April:
>
>
> #1. Separating conformance/restrictions for vocabulary definitions
>
>  - previous discussions:
>  -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-er-minutes#item04>
>  -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/04/06-er-minutes#item02>
>
>  - more detailed explanation:
>  -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Mar/0007>
>
>  - questions to consider:
>  -- can you live with conformance/restrictions moving out of the 
> vocabulary definition documents, and into a more specific document?
Yes, if it remains normative.

>  -- if so, what other guidance would go along with this guidance on 
> conformance/restrictions for EARL tool developers?
>  -- is it imaginable that the focus (and title, if needed) of the EARL 
> Guide could shift to match the guidance we want to provide?
It should.

>
> References:
>  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues#conformance>
>  - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-EARL10-Schema-20091029/#conformance>
>  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/issues#conformance>
>  - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-HTTP-in-RDF10-20091029/#conformance>
>
>
> #2. HTTP-in-RDF Message Header
>
>  - previous discussion:
>  -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-er-minutes#item05>
>
>  - proposed solution:
>  -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Mar/0008>
>
>  - question to consider: do you accept the proposed solution?

Yes.

>
> References:
>  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/issues#MessageClass>
>  - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-HTTP-in-RDF10-20091029/#MessageClass>
>
>
> #3. HTTP-in-RDF PATCH Method
>
>  - previous discussion:
>  -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-er-minutes#item05>
>
>  - proposed solution:
>  -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Apr/0001>
>
>  - question to consider: do you accept the proposed solution?

Yes.

>
> References:
>  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/issues#MethodClass>
>  - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-HTTP-in-RDF10-20091029/#MethodClass>
>
>
> #4. Proposed batch-resolutions
>
>  - suggestions for resolutions to open comments:
>  -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Mar/0010>
>
>  - note: item #5 dct:identifier/status code will be handled separately
>
>  - question to consider: do you accept the proposed solution?

Yes, but like others would prefer to keep http.

Regards,
  CI.

>
>
>
> Regards,
>   Shadi
>


-- 

Carlos Iglesias

CTIC-Centro Tecnológico
Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Gijón
C/ Ada Byron, 39 Edificio Centros Tecnológicos
33203 Gijón - Asturias - España
Tel.: +34 984 29 12 12
Fax: +34 984 39 06 12
E-mail: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
http://www.fundacionctic.org
Política de Privacidad: http://www.fundacionctic.org/privacidad

Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 13:06:22 UTC