- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:41:11 +0200
- To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Dear ERT WG, As per our teleconference meeting last week, here is a more in-depth description of the conformance issue and the solution proposed. Please review this carefully and feel free to respond with any comments and questions before next weeks' call, where I hope we can make a decision. # Issue In one way, EARL provides a vocabulary of *semantic* terms that can (and should) be used in many different ways. Like we use terms from FOAF, Dublin Core, and potential DOAP vocabularies, we also want to promote reuse of EARL terms in different contexts. For those people, the conformance section does not make sense as currently written. On the other hand, we want to continue to define a *syntax* for tool developers to exchange evaluation data. That is, a particular way of using the EARL terms so that an EARL producer and EARL consumer can exchange a well defined EARL report. We have definitions for these already, but they are somewhat mixed with the vocabulary definition. # Proposal Move the conformance sections from their current location to the EARL 1.0 Guide document, but keep a cross-reference that is clearly focused to tool developers. This way the current specs become pure vocabulary definitions, and the EARL 1.0 Guide becomes a more relevant source for tool developers. This involves minimal changes yet several benefits. Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Monday, 28 March 2011 10:41:41 UTC