- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:23:25 +0200
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi Charles, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> There is an open issue that the Test Subject class does not have a >> (built in) mechanism to identify what it is describing (a handle). > > RDF itself provides this, by pointing to a resource. If you want to use > dc:foo or some other form of identification there is nothing to stop > you, but I don't think they should be mandatory. > > I strongly object (and would make a formal objection) to a uri property > as an identifier (other than r:resource) for the reasons outlined by > Shadi. I suggets we do nothing, and encourage people to use rdf:resource So you prefer rdf:resource over uri:uri. How about test subjects that are not identified by a URI in the first place? Do we want to even consider these for EARL 1.0 (question to the whole group)? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 07:23:41 UTC