- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:19:36 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> During last weeks' teleconference we briefly discussed refining the >> cardinality constrains on the properties of the result class (by >> defining appropriate min/maxCardinality restrictions). The current >> proposal is to have exactly 1 validity and exactly 1 confidence >> properties per result class. > > I believe we should have no confidence property for many results, so it > should be optional. My fault! I *did* mean exactly 1 validity and at most 1 confidence. > I would also like a structure that allowed for multiple validates if > people did use confidence, a la > > earl:Assertion > result > _blank1 > validity: pass > confidence: low > _blank2 > validity: not applicable > confidence: medium And what does the above mean? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 07:19:45 UTC