Re: maximum cardinality on result properties

(regrets for the call, as previously advised)

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:41:02 +0200, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:

> During last weeks' teleconference we briefly discussed refining the  
> cardinality constrains on the properties of the result class (by  
> defining appropriate min/maxCardinality restrictions). The current  
> proposal is to have exactly 1 validity and exactly 1 confidence  
> properties per result class.

I believe we should have no confidence property for many results, so it  
should be optional. (I have said elsewhere that I believe it has horribly  
poor interoperability and don't think we should try to define that  
ourselves). I would also like a structure that allowed for multiple  
validities if people did use confidence, a la

earl:Assertion
   result
     _blank1
       validity: pass
       confidence: low
     _blank2
       validity: not applicable
       confidence: medium

cheers

Chaals

-- 
   Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com          Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com

Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 21:12:03 UTC