- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:08:31 +0200
- To: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
At 16:29 29/03/2006, Jon Ribbens wrote: >Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca> wrote: > > One of the things I found surprising is the requirement for web > > sites to validate as 'strict'. > >It's not that surprising, it's effectively also a requirement for >WCAG 1.0 "AA" compliance (checkpoints 3.2 and 11.2). Hmm. I don't see the word "strict" in those success criteria. For conformance to WCAG 1.0 you can still use the transitional DTDs and avoid their deprecated features. Is that also what the Stanca Act allows, or does it only allow the Strict DTD? Regards, Christophe -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2006 09:07:27 UTC