- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:10:33 +0200
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Christophe Strobbe wrote: > At 16:29 29/03/2006, Jon Ribbens wrote: > >> Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca> wrote: >> > One of the things I found surprising is the requirement for web >> > sites to validate as 'strict'. >> >> It's not that surprising, it's effectively also a requirement for >> WCAG 1.0 "AA" compliance (checkpoints 3.2 and 11.2). > > > Hmm. I don't see the word "strict" in those success criteria. > For conformance to WCAG 1.0 you can still use the transitional DTDs > and avoid their deprecated features. Well, yes. But why do you reference a transitional document type when you use only markup from the strict one? -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2006 09:10:59 UTC