Re: Accessibility Tests For Stanca Act

Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca> wrote:
> One of the things I found surprising is the requirement for web
> sites to validate as 'strict'.

It's not that surprising, it's effectively also a requirement for
WCAG 1.0 "AA" compliance (checkpoints 3.2 and 11.2).

Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2006 14:30:28 UTC