Re: New EARL 1.0 Schema Editors' Draft

Shadi,

The new draft looks very good! Thanks for all the hard work from you and 
Charles.

I'm a little confused by the use of the validity level, for example 
earl:fail. Example 11 shows the use of earl:validity as:
<earl:validity 
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#fail"/>

This example makes sense to me and does not use the validity level 
earl:fail. How would we use the validity level values?

I'd like to see more information on conformance even though that may be 
beyond the scope of this document. Creating EARL documents that are 
interchangeable is important to EARL's acceptance so it would be very 
helpful to ensure each document conforms to the spec.

Cheers,
Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>
To: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 12:00 PM
Subject: New EARL 1.0 Schema Editors' Draft


>
> Dear Group,
>
> Thanks to great work by Charles over the holiday period we now have a new 
> Editors' Draft of the EARL 1.0 Schema document:
>  <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20060101>
>
> Please read it carefully and consider the editorial comments and 
> questions. We will be discussing it on our upcoming teleconference call 
> next Wednesday 11 January, 2006.
>
> Regards,
>  Shadi
>
>
> -- 
> Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & 
> Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web 
> Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility 
> Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, 
> Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: 
> +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |

Received on Thursday, 5 January 2006 21:07:31 UTC