Re: [ACTION] represenation of simple and more complicated HTTP conversation in RDF from Johannes Koch on 2006-12-12 (public-wai-ert@w3.org from December 2006)

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:13:58 +0100
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Message-ID: <457EF166.7000600@fit.fraunhofer.de>

Johannes Koch schrieb:
>> Probably you performed the evaluation on wc2 because it 
>> contain actual content. So the subject would be wc2. If OTOH 
>> you did an evaluation on wc1, the subject would be wc1.
> 

Carlos Iglesias schrieb:
> So the idea is to have a RDF container with both, wc1 and wc2, and point from subjet to wc2 which is inside a ¿standalone? container. Isn't it?

If you need the combination of wc1 and wc2 for something else, you can 
create an rdf:Seq with references to both wc1 and wc2.
-- 
Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628

Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 18:14:29 UTC