RE: [ACTION] represenation of simple and more complicated HTTP conversation in RDF

 

> Carlos Iglesias schrieb:
> > I don't know exactly what, but I think something is missing.
> > 
> > Let's say we have:
> > 
> > <earl:Assertion rdf:ID="#assertion">
> >   <earl:assertedBy rdf:resource="#assertor" />
> >   <earl:subject rdf:resource="#subject" />
> >   <earl:test rdf:resource="#testcase" />
> >   <earl:result rdf:resource="#result" /> </earl:Assertion>
> > 
> > For example in the case of an assertion about a content with 
> > transparent content negotation, what WebContent should you use as 
> > Subject of the Assertion?
> > 
> > Wc1? Wc2? A RDF container with both?
> 
> Probably you performed the evaluation on wc2 because it 
> contain actual content. So the subject would be wc2. If OTOH 
> you did an evaluation on wc1, the subject would be wc1.

So the idea is to have a RDF container with both, wc1 and wc2, and point from subjet to wc2 which is inside a ¿standalone? container. Isn't it?

Regards,
 CI.