- From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:17:50 +0100
- To: "Johannes Koch" <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>, "ERT group" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
> Carlos Iglesias schrieb: > > I don't know exactly what, but I think something is missing. > > > > Let's say we have: > > > > <earl:Assertion rdf:ID="#assertion"> > > <earl:assertedBy rdf:resource="#assertor" /> > > <earl:subject rdf:resource="#subject" /> > > <earl:test rdf:resource="#testcase" /> > > <earl:result rdf:resource="#result" /> </earl:Assertion> > > > > For example in the case of an assertion about a content with > > transparent content negotation, what WebContent should you use as > > Subject of the Assertion? > > > > Wc1? Wc2? A RDF container with both? > > Probably you performed the evaluation on wc2 because it > contain actual content. So the subject would be wc2. If OTOH > you did an evaluation on wc1, the subject would be wc1. So the idea is to have a RDF container with both, wc1 and wc2, and point from subjet to wc2 which is inside a ¿standalone? container. Isn't it? Regards, CI.
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 17:18:06 UTC