W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Confidence claims in EARL assertions

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 19:06:58 +0200
Message-ID: <4294B0B2.2090705@w3.org>
To: Nils Ulltveit-Moe <nils@u-moe.no>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Hi Nils,

Nils Ulltveit-Moe wrote:
> What is required to release a Working Group Note on aggregation, and
> what are the further procedures?

Basically a Working Group needs to be chartered by the W3C Membership to carry out deliverables. ERT WG is chartered to deliver "Input into tools for aggregating accessibility metadata among multiple sources". See:

> Would the ERT group stand behind such a note, or is it outside of scope,
> so that it must be done under another working group (e.g. WAI or EOWG)
> or a new one?

This is somewhat within scope yet I can not decide on behalf of the Working Group if we want to address this deliverable through a WG Note. The group needs to decide collectively.

> What would be your gut-feeling for a time frame for getting something
> started on this?

Depends how many *participants of the WG* are interested in this work and actively contribute to the development of such a WG Note. Currently the group seems to be focusing on EARL which makes sense (such a WG Note can only be written after EARL becomes stable).


Shadi Abou-Zahra,       Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),             http://www.w3.org/ 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),      http://www.w3.org/WAI/ 
IST WAI-TIES Project (WAI-TIES)     http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ 
Evaluation and Repair Tools (ERT WG), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 
2004, Route des Lucioles BP93 - 06560 Sophia-Antipolis - France 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64             Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 17:06:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:52:49 UTC