- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:04:10 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
Hi,
Draft minutes are available at
<http://www.w3.org/2008/11/18-tsdtf-minutes.html>.
Here's a recap of what we decided to do with test samples that have
already been surveyed [1] (i.e. after WCAG 2.0 CR, but before WCAG 2.0 PR):
(1) test samples on which the task force had already voted (001-004, 016, 018):
- check if references to techniques are still valid (note: there
is a diff-marked version of the Techniques document [2])
- check if changes made after 30 September telecon are OK [3].
If there are no issues,
then the test sample can move to "holding" status;
else,
the test sample needs to be sent back and modified.
(2) test samples on which the task force has not voted yet (019, 026,
030, 036, 037, 042; 041 was rejected):
- check if references to techniques are still valid.
If there are no issues,
then the test sample can be discussed in our next telecon for a
TF decision;
else,
the test sample needs to be sent back and modified.
[1] <http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42683/batch1/results>
[2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20081103/complete-diff.html>
[3]
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Oct/0006.html>
Best regards,
Christophe Strobbe
--
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
---
Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other
"social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but
I haven't.
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:05:00 UTC