- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:04:10 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
Hi, Draft minutes are available at <http://www.w3.org/2008/11/18-tsdtf-minutes.html>. Here's a recap of what we decided to do with test samples that have already been surveyed [1] (i.e. after WCAG 2.0 CR, but before WCAG 2.0 PR): (1) test samples on which the task force had already voted (001-004, 016, 018): - check if references to techniques are still valid (note: there is a diff-marked version of the Techniques document [2]) - check if changes made after 30 September telecon are OK [3]. If there are no issues, then the test sample can move to "holding" status; else, the test sample needs to be sent back and modified. (2) test samples on which the task force has not voted yet (019, 026, 030, 036, 037, 042; 041 was rejected): - check if references to techniques are still valid. If there are no issues, then the test sample can be discussed in our next telecon for a TF decision; else, the test sample needs to be sent back and modified. [1] <http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42683/batch1/results> [2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20081103/complete-diff.html> [3] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Oct/0006.html> Best regards, Christophe Strobbe -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ --- Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other "social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but I haven't. Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:05:00 UTC