Hi Tim, Tim Boland wrote: > Thanks for doing this work. I'm confused - first you say the GL mailing > list has not been > successful, and then you propose using the GL mailing list for > communication with the > WCAG WG (in the last * item) (or am I misunderstanding?). I could not think of anything better right now ... > The WCAG WG is currently working off of an issues database to process WD > comments. As a possible alternative for communication, is there a > possibility to ask the powers that be to include a "testing" category in > that database, to handle testing issues that arise from the TSDTF > work? That way, the structure that currently exists in the database > could be used to the maximum extent possible, and since the WCAG WG is > used to processing issues in this database, communication might be > facilitated... Do you mean their Bugzilla? Yes, maybe we could use that instead: Michael? regards, carlos -- Dr Carlos A Velasco Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT) BIKA Web Compliance Center - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/ Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 19:49:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:53:27 UTC