Fwd: [RDFa] Proposal for test process

fyi..
Tim Boland NIST

>X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
>Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:06:45 +0100
>X-MS-Has-Attach:
>X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
>Thread-Topic: [RDFa] Proposal for test process
>thread-index: AcdfzsORuuWxYuDLRAGp9lIv01CCtw==
>From: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
>To: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
>Cc: "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, <www-qa@w3.org>
>X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5
>X-W3C-Scan-Sig: aji.w3.org 1HOVYN-0001It-Oa 471cc38e4eb94944851ddf5362dc26b6
>X-Original-To: www-qa@w3.org
>Subject: [RDFa] Proposal for test process
>X-Archived-At: 
>http://www.w3.org/mid/768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852FF5C51@RZJC2EX.jr1.local
>Resent-From: www-qa@w3.org
>X-Mailing-List: <www-qa@w3.org> archive/latest/2315
>X-Loop: www-qa@w3.org
>Sender: www-qa-request@w3.org
>Resent-Sender: www-qa-request@w3.org
>List-Id: <www-qa.w3.org>
>List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:www-qa-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:02:07 +0000
>X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure 
>engine=4.65.5502:2.3.11,1.2.37,4.0.164 
>definitions=2007-03-06_01:2007-03-03,2007-03-05,2007-03-06 signatures=0
>X-PP-SpamDetails: rule=spampolicy2_notspam policy=spampolicy2 score=0 
>spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 
>reason=mlx engine=3.1.0-0701160000 definitions=main-0703060001
>X-PP-SpamScore: 0
>X-NIST-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>X-NIST-MailScanner-From: www-qa-request@listhub.w3.org
>
>
>
>All,
>
>To enable a smooth and reliable process regarding the
>handling of RDFa TC, I'd like to suggest the following:
>
>1. We (RDFa-TF) define the role of a 'TC responsible' (TCR)
>    that is the process owner for all TC-related issues
>
>2. In case a (not yet covered) feature is expected
>    to be tested, anyone may send a mail with a short
>    description to either:
>     + this list (public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org) using
>       [RDFa-TC] as a prefix OR
>     + public-rdfa-test@w3.org (yet to be established)
>
>    We should agree on ONE of the two options :)
>
>3. The TCR is then responsible for ...
>     +  raising an according issue (in Tracker), and
>     +  getting the new TC onto the next telecon's agenda
>        for discussion
>
>4. The fallback for the TCR is the TF chair.
>
>
>Even though this might sound like a bit of an overkill,
>IMHO it is a good thing to define at least an ideal
>process that we can refer to and people know what to
>expect.
>
>I'd be _very_ happy if we can agree on this process
>(or an adapted version) ASAP, to start doing so; cf.
>for example DanC's request w.r.t. TC [1].
>
>Note: w3.org seems to be down at the time writing,
>       so please be lenient towards me that I did
>       not include references as usual ...
>
>Cheers,
>         Michael
>
>BTW: I volunteer to initially fill the TCR role ;)
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000002.htm
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
>  Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
>  Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
>  JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>  Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
>
>  <office>
>     phone: +43-316-876-1193 (fax:-1191)
>    e-mail: michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at
>       web: http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
>
>  <private>
>    mobile: +43-660-7621761
>       web: http://www.sw-app.org/
>----------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 14:16:00 UTC