W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > March 2007

Coverage and open issues

From: Carlos A Velasco <Carlos.Velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:56:24 +0100
Message-ID: <45ED7308.2050306@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: TSDTF <public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org>

Hi all,

According to my action item from last call [1], we need to figure out
some kind of formal procedure to feed back to WCAG WG coverage issues or
ambiguities we found when developing TCs. Thus far, the use of the -gl
mailing list did not prove to be very successful from the BenToWeb
perspective (Michael has received a compilation of issues from Christophe).

I propose the following process for such cases:
- Open in the Wiki a new section on this (I will prepare some template
later this week). This page will have an index of open issues.
- Every issue page will have the following content:
  * Title
  * Success criteria and/or technique and/or common failure
  * Status: pending or solved
  * Description of the issue
  * Proposal on the solution
  * Reference to relevant test sample(s), if any
  * Link to the mail/thread to the GL mailing list where the WG
    is informed of the issue

Does this sounds reasonable?


[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/02/27-tsdtf-minutes.html#action03
Dr Carlos A Velasco
  Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT)
  BIKA Web Compliance Center - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/
  Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany)
  Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 13:57:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:53:27 UTC