Hi all, According to my action item from last call [1], we need to figure out some kind of formal procedure to feed back to WCAG WG coverage issues or ambiguities we found when developing TCs. Thus far, the use of the -gl mailing list did not prove to be very successful from the BenToWeb perspective (Michael has received a compilation of issues from Christophe). I propose the following process for such cases: - Open in the Wiki a new section on this (I will prepare some template later this week). This page will have an index of open issues. - Every issue page will have the following content: * Title * Success criteria and/or technique and/or common failure * Status: pending or solved * Description of the issue * Proposal on the solution * Reference to relevant test sample(s), if any * Link to the mail/thread to the GL mailing list where the WG is informed of the issue Does this sounds reasonable? regards, carlos [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/02/27-tsdtf-minutes.html#action03 -- Dr Carlos A Velasco Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT) BIKA Web Compliance Center - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/ Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 13:57:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:53:27 UTC