Hi Shadi, all, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > We should also consider adding EARL reports in the metadata section of > the test samples repository or in a new branch of the hierarchy. I was thinking (if I am not missing something) that the "expected EARL reports" of the test samples (that would be for instance be compared with those produced by tools) would be generated automatically (XSLT with parameters) from TCDL (i.e. rules element – do we have all required info?). This maybe raises an issue of either developing a mapping document of TCDL-EARL either a kind of integration. Am I with you (??) In that case, considering the status of EARL and time pressure my vote would go for 1st. regards, Vangelis -- Evangelos Vlachogiannis Researcher - University of the Aegean Contact&More: http://www.syros.aegean.gr/users/evlach/contactme.php -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/449 - Release Date: 15/9/2006Received on Monday, 18 September 2006 17:33:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:53:26 UTC