- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:59:27 +0200
- To: TSDTF <public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060914155425.02fbda38@mailserv.esat.kuleuven.be>
Hi, Attached you will find a new draft. Below is a list of most of the changes: * 'dc:creator' now has a note saying that a constant will be added; * 'dc:rights' now has a note saying that a constant (with a pointer to the license) will be added; * 'date' now says that it was chosen over 'dc:date' because of the data type; * 'status' now says we will use the values from the Conformance Test Process For WCAG 2.0 , but we can obviously discuss this on the next telecon; * 'version' now has a note saying that a constant ($version of CVS numbering will be used, and the element is now required; * 'source' will not be used [1]; * 'dc:contributor' will not be used [1]; * 'technicalSpec/@xlink:href' now has 6 examples to clarify what should go in that attribute; * 'specReference/@xlink:href' now has 4 examples to clarify what should go in that attribute; * 'testElements' now says that we will drop it if it turns out to drain too many resources; * a section on baselines has been added; * 'description' now says it was chosen over 'dc:description' because of the data type; * 'requiredTests' will not be used [1]; * 'file/@xlink:href' now has examples to clarify what should go in that attribute; * in 'httpRequest' the attributes enctype and mediatype were removed (header elements could cover the same function); * in 'httpRequest', the attribute 'method' (for specifying the HTTP method) was added; * the 'rule' element now has an optional 'techniques' element that enables us to point of WCAG 2.0 techniques and/or failures; * 'functionalOutcome' will not be used; * 'techComment' now has an example; * there is now a chapter on the extensibility mechanisms; * there is now a chapter on the "Rulesets XML"; * there is now a chapter describing the ID/naming convention for the test cases (http://www.w3.org/2006/09/05-tsdtf-minutes). Some other issues: * I have assumed that we wanted to make 'version' required. * Do we want to remove 'preconditions' or is there a use case for it? * I have not yet added the EARL location pointers. Please send your comments on this document at least 2 hours before the next teleconference. [1] When I write that element x will not be used, that means there is currently a note about this in the spec. When we have agreed on the final spec, those elements will be removed and an XML schema for TCDL without those elements will be created. Regards, Christophe -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Attachments
- text/css attachment: W3C-Member-SUBM.css
- text/html attachment: BenToWeb_TCDL_W3C_Submission_DraftF.html
Received on Monday, 18 September 2006 16:00:12 UTC