Re: TCDL 2.0 template

Hi Christophe,

Thank you for working on this! Please find some comments below:

#1: Dummy-values
- I am wondering if it is better to create a fictional test sample 
instead of having dummy-values like "@@title". You could then also use 
example.org URIs where needed rather than many of the dummy values. This 
may also answer some of Tim's questions posted else where.

#2: Completeness
- Please add some examples of the HTTP vocabulary and EARL pointers. 
Again, you could use example.org URIs to fill the spaces.

#3: Comments
- Some comments are very helpful, for example the warning about using 
dated URIs. However, others about validation may not belong in here but 
rather in the actual spec. Feel free to add more comments, together with 
the fictional values within the elements, they may be very explanatory.
- Please add a comment at the very top of the document indicating that 
it is a template, and note the URI of the TCDL 2.0 spec as well as the 
usage document; people could land by mistake on this page.


Regards,
   Shadi


cstrobbe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I had an action item to create a TCDL 2.0 template (in XML). Please 
> find attached a template (scx.x.x_lx_xxx.xml). 
> Please review this template and let me know if this format is useful.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Christophe
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |

Received on Monday, 20 November 2006 10:51:06 UTC