Re: TCDL 2.0 template (with more comments etc)

Hi Shadi, All,

Thanks for your comments and suggestions.

Quoting Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>:
<quote>
(...) Please find some comments below:

#1: Dummy-values
 - I am wondering if it is better to create a fictional test sample 
  instead of having dummy-values like "@@title". You could then also
  use example.org URIs where needed rather than many of
  the dummy values. This  may also answer some of Tim's
  questions posted else where.

#2: Completeness
 - Please add some examples of the HTTP vocabulary and EARL pointers.
   Again, you could use example.org URIs to fill the spaces.

#3: Comments
 - Some comments are very helpful, for example the warning about 
   using dated URIs. However, others about validation may not 
   belong in here but rather in the actual spec. Feel free to 
   add more comments, together with the fictional values within
   the elements, they may be very explanatory.
 - Please add a comment at the very top of the document
   indicating that it is a template, and
   note the URI of the TCDL 2.0 spec as well as the 
   usage document; people could land by mistake on this page.
</quote>

I have integrated the comments.
I'm attaching the file again because it is not yet available on the 
BenToWeb site.

Regards,

Christophe

-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 

Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm