Re: WAI mobile feedback

I don't have a date for a draft at this point but it won't be in time for
the usability testing; I'll try to do my best. I apologize for committing
to something that I obviously don't have the bandwidth for.

On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org> wrote:

> Hi Susan and Charlotte,
>
> Thanks very much for this.  My responses are inline below. Note that I am
> speaking only for myself as I have not had time to discuss with Brent. If
> he has a different perspective I expect he will weigh in.
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Susan Hewitt <susan.hewitt@deque.com>
> wrote:
>
>> -There was no direct comment in the feedback on moving the first two
>> sections of the developer tutorial into the main mobile section (only
>> comments on contributing to the edits.) Kathy is fine with moving it but is
>> unsure about Judy. Our preference is still to move this content but in
>> interest of time we will not pursue this with Judy, pre-launch.
>>
>
> We did not comment on this since we assumed you were working it out with
> the TF. If you and Kathy agree that those two sections are best included in
> the intro, please do so ASAP as a draft. We can circulate for comments and
> Judy can be part of that process.  We need to be moving things forward at
> this point. As noted "time is very limited."
>
> -Since time is very limited we plan to go ahead and draft the content,
>> allowing the reviewers, and then EO, to comment and propose edits rather
>> than crafting and submitting an outline draft proposal again. For this
>> pre-launch period, we will maintain our focus on the three questions given
>> in the feedback (below) and ensure they continue to be addressed in the
>> revised content.
>>
>>    - Does W3C have/maintain mobile accessibility standards?
>>    - What is W3C doing related to mobile accessibility?
>>    - Where can I learn more about mobile accessibility?
>>
>> Good and when will we have that draft? As you know we are doing usability
> testing this week and had hoped to have much more content in place.
>
>
>>
>> Outstanding question:
>> The following isn't clear to me
>>
>>    1. Navigation: As you work on edits to the page consider how it is
>>    fitting into the new top navigation of the site redesign <
>>    http://w3c.github.io/wai-website/ <http://w3c.github.io/wai-website/>>
>>       - Under "Standards/Guidelines" is the placeholder for this
>>       resource "Mobile Accessibility at W3C"
>>       - Under "Design & Develop" is "Mobile Accessibility Intro"
>>
>> Are we required to shoehorn this limited content into these two different
>> sections? Why is there not just one place for this relatively small amount
>> of content? (Not talking about the tutorial.)
>>
>
> No those two sections are not mandatory, but are placeholders suggested
> since we had not received clear direction about the approach that you are
> taking to the topic.  Happy to accept your suggestions for how to
> restructure.  Please advise ASAP.
>
> Best,
> Sharron
>
>
>


-- 
Susan Hewitt, CPACC
Senior Accessibility Consultant
Deque Systems, Inc
deque.com