- From: Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:49:54 -0500
- To: Susan Hewitt <susan.hewitt@deque.com>
- Cc: WSTF <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>, "Bakken, Brent" <brent.bakken@pearson.com>, "Wise, Charlotte" <cwise@visa.com>
- Message-ID: <CA++nJxrZRsQKy8GPGXXP1CVzbFGgS6dLAKFkCk0xAMzt1j+j7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Ruefully smiling and nodding - I know *just* what you mean. Thanks for your help! On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Susan Hewitt <susan.hewitt@deque.com> wrote: > I don't have a date for a draft at this point but it won't be in time for > the usability testing; I'll try to do my best. I apologize for committing > to something that I obviously don't have the bandwidth for. > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org> > wrote: > >> Hi Susan and Charlotte, >> >> Thanks very much for this. My responses are inline below. Note that I am >> speaking only for myself as I have not had time to discuss with Brent. If >> he has a different perspective I expect he will weigh in. >> >> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Susan Hewitt <susan.hewitt@deque.com> >> wrote: >> >>> -There was no direct comment in the feedback on moving the first two >>> sections of the developer tutorial into the main mobile section (only >>> comments on contributing to the edits.) Kathy is fine with moving it but is >>> unsure about Judy. Our preference is still to move this content but in >>> interest of time we will not pursue this with Judy, pre-launch. >>> >> >> We did not comment on this since we assumed you were working it out with >> the TF. If you and Kathy agree that those two sections are best included in >> the intro, please do so ASAP as a draft. We can circulate for comments and >> Judy can be part of that process. We need to be moving things forward at >> this point. As noted "time is very limited." >> >> -Since time is very limited we plan to go ahead and draft the content, >>> allowing the reviewers, and then EO, to comment and propose edits rather >>> than crafting and submitting an outline draft proposal again. For this >>> pre-launch period, we will maintain our focus on the three questions given >>> in the feedback (below) and ensure they continue to be addressed in the >>> revised content. >>> >>> - Does W3C have/maintain mobile accessibility standards? >>> - What is W3C doing related to mobile accessibility? >>> - Where can I learn more about mobile accessibility? >>> >>> Good and when will we have that draft? As you know we are doing >> usability testing this week and had hoped to have much more content in >> place. >> >> >>> >>> Outstanding question: >>> The following isn't clear to me >>> >>> 1. Navigation: As you work on edits to the page consider how it is >>> fitting into the new top navigation of the site redesign < >>> http://w3c.github.io/wai-website/ <http://w3c.github.io/wai-website/> >>> > >>> - Under "Standards/Guidelines" is the placeholder for this >>> resource "Mobile Accessibility at W3C" >>> - Under "Design & Develop" is "Mobile Accessibility Intro" >>> >>> Are we required to shoehorn this limited content into these two >>> different sections? Why is there not just one place for this relatively >>> small amount of content? (Not talking about the tutorial.) >>> >> >> No those two sections are not mandatory, but are placeholders suggested >> since we had not received clear direction about the approach that you are >> taking to the topic. Happy to accept your suggestions for how to >> restructure. Please advise ASAP. >> >> Best, >> Sharron >> >> >> > > > -- > Susan Hewitt, CPACC > Senior Accessibility Consultant > Deque Systems, Inc > deque.com > > -- Sharron Rush | Executive Director | Knowbility.org | @knowbility *Equal access to technology for people with disabilities*
Received on Saturday, 30 September 2017 20:50:18 UTC