- From: Shawn Lawton Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:19:50 -0600
- To: "'Sailesh Panchang'" <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>, <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
Hi, Sailesh, Have you had a chance to look at the navigation since we changed it to <ol>s? We will be discussing this on the upcoming Monday WSTF teleconference and it would be great if you could join or send your comments beforehand. ~ Shawn > -----Original Message----- > From: Shawn Lawton Henry [mailto:shawn@w3.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:39 PM > To: 'Sailesh Panchang'; 'public-wai-eo-site@w3.org' > Subject: RE: usability testing notes - RE: WSTF Agenda for 25 > October 2004 > > > From: Sailesh Panchang [mailto:sailesh.panchang@deque.com] > (http://www.w3.org/2004/09/wai-nav/8-gr.html) > Normally in other menus I have seen, the plus sign is a link > and so is the text adjacent to it. > Is selecting the plus link and the adjacent text link > supposed to produce the same effect? But on the WAI page > under discussion, the plus sign is part of the link. So I > wonder what is the purpose of the plus sign?To me it just > appears like a link and selecting it takes me to the next > level and so forth. > > Shawn replies: > In the current prototype, the plus sign and the text adjacent > to it do the exact same thing; thus, they are one link. The > plus sign is to indicate that there are "children" under that > node. So, it is working "correctly". However, we should > consider if it seems wrong because it is somewhat different > from some other implementations. > > From: Sailesh Panchang [mailto:sailesh.panchang@deque.com] > Interestingly, WinEyes does not announce the plus sign but > just reads the link. > > Shawn replies: > We should consider the impact of this. > > Thanks for the comments! > > ~ Shawn >
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 16:19:52 UTC