- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:50:36 +0100
- To: Eric Eggert <mail@yatil.de>
- CC: public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org
Hi Eric, all, Thank you for doing this review! Personally I don't think that we should prioritize these changes, there is a lot of other work waiting for us on this Demo. What do others think? Best, Shadi Eric Eggert wrote: > > Hi all. > > I’ve had a look into the accessible demo pages in regard of applying > various alternate stylesheets to provide a small accessibility zen garden. > > Conclusion first: I’s possible but not easy. > > There is lots of presentational markup in the demo like twelve or > something divs for the shadow around the site which wouldn’t exactly > hinder the ability to style it but can’t be considered best practice. > > Another problem are the inbound images, like the logo and weather info, > which are hard to replace by other fancy looking graphics and/or plain > text. > > There is no image replacement possible as the markup is missing @id on > several headlines and the markup is sometimes hard to understand as > class names are neither presentational (e.g. left and right) or semantic > (like primarycontent and secondarycontent) but sometimes obscure like c2 > and c7 which represent the left and right column on the info demo page. > > > That said, a rebrush would really be nice for those pages, probably some > lighter colors and a not so boxy layout. One could really do something > like that to present those pages in a more modern way. > > I personally wouldn’t redesign the pages without touching the markup as > there are some things which could be optimized and simplified. > > Any comments? > > Regards, Eric > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 16:56:26 UTC