Re: Minutes of the WAI Coordination call of 6 June 2018

Late Regrets!

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 3:36 PM Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@paciellogroup.com>
wrote:

> formatted minutes:
> https://www.w3.org/2018/06/06-waicc-minutes.html
>
>
> Text of minutes:
>     [1]W3C
>
>        [1] http://www.w3.org/
>
>                                 - DRAFT -
>
>                    WAI Coordination Call Teleconference
>
> 06 Jun 2018
>
> Attendees
>
>     Present
>            janina, Judy, MichaelC, Joanmarie_Diggs, tzviya, jeanne
>
>     Regrets
>           George
>     Chair
>            JBrewer
>
>     Scribe
>            jeanne, Judy
>
> Contents
>
>       * [2]Topics
>           1. [3]Confirm scribe, rrsagent, agenda, confirm next
>              meeting
>           2. [4]WCAG 2.1 done!
>              https://www.w3.org/2018/06/pressrelease-wcag21.html.en
>              and supporting resources
>           3. [5]Next AG WG steps? Latest Silver:
>              https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/201
>              8Jun/0010.html
>           4. [6]M-Enabling coordination? http://www.m-enabling.com/
>           5. [7]TPAC planning
>              https://www.w3.org/2018/10/TPAC/Overview.html
>           6. [8]Other conferences to promote coverage at?
>           7. [9]Accessibility-outreach-related community groups,
>              EOWG connection? (Not in APA scope)
>              https://www.w3.org/community/groups/
>           8. [10]"Verticals" report/visit?
>           9. [11]Call scheduling questions...
>       * [12]Summary of Action Items
>       * [13]Summary of Resolutions
>       __________________________________________________________
>
> Confirm scribe, rrsagent, agenda, confirm next meeting
>
>     <Judy> JB: Any advance regrets for the 20th?
>
>     <Judy> JD: Yes
>
>     <Judy> JB: Is this time slot becoming more difficult?
>
>     <jeanne> JS: moderately difficult
>
>     <Judy> SAZ: Always difficult on CET
>
>     <Judy> JD: Somewhat difficult
>
>     <MichaelC> Michael is unlikely to be able to do a different
>     time if the meeting changes
>
>     <tzviya> any meeting that is longer than one hour is difficult
>     to accommodate
>
>     <Judy> ACTION: Judy check calendar and try to offer alternate
>     times
>
>     <trackbot> Created ACTION-6 - Check calendar and try to offer
>     alternate times [on Judy Brewer - due 2018-06-13].
>
>     <Judy> Next meeting June 20th
>
>     <Judy> JB: will try to explore some options for later
>
> WCAG 2.1 done!
> [14]https://www.w3.org/2018/06/pressrelease-wcag21.html.en and
> supporting resources
>
>       [14] https://www.w3.org/2018/06/pressrelease-wcag21.html.en
>
>     <MichaelC> [15]https://www.w3.org/blog/2018/06/wcag21-rec/
>
>       [15] https://www.w3.org/blog/2018/06/wcag21-rec/
>
>     <Judy>
>     [16]https://www.w3.org/community/silver/stakeholder-job-stories
>     /
>
>       [16] https://www.w3.org/community/silver/stakeholder-job-stories/
>
>     <jeanne> scribe: jeanne
>
> Next AG WG steps? Latest Silver:
> [17]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2018Jun/0010.h
> tml <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2018Jun/0010.html>
>
>       [17]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2018Jun/0010.html
>
>     <Judy> scribe: Judy
>
>     [JB: Webex drops out]
>
>     Jeanne: We're starting an information architecture review, so
>     I'd compiled a list, including how there are structured
>     ... probably not so relevant for today's discussion
>     ... though the requirements document would be useful for next
>     meeting
>
>     JB: would like to have that update at the appropriate time
>
>     Jeanne: Getting AGWG review next week
>
>     JB: Makes sense to get AGWG review first. Will do on the 20th.
>
>     <scribe> scribe: jeanne
>
> M-Enabling coordination? [18]http://www.m-enabling.com/
>
>       [18] http://www.m-enabling.com/
>
>     <janina> Not attending
>
>     JB: Quick check who on this call will be at M-Enabling?
>     ... Judy and Shadi
>
> TPAC planning [19]https://www.w3.org/2018/10/TPAC/Overview.html
>
>       [19] https://www.w3.org/2018/10/TPAC/Overview.html
>
>     JB: The schedule is out and several groups have checked their
>     times. Are there any questions or coordination needs?
>
>     JSa: APA has made a list of desired meetings, as part of
>     organizing our TPAC plans.
>
>     JB: There has been a publishing "track" at former TPAC
>     meetings. Is that accurate?
>
>     Tzviya: There will be meeting in Tokoyo prior to TPAC that will
>     have most of the attendance.
>     ... there will be 20-30 members of the working group at TPAC
>
>     JB: Have you coordinated with EOWG?
>
>     <Judy> ...and would that be useful?
>
>     Tzviya: We have met with them in the past. We are going to be
>     talking about some aspects of the publishing business which may
>     be of interest to EO. WHo should I reach out to?
>
>     JB: Shawn Henry, Sharron Rush or Brent Bakken
>     ... Respond to W3C Admin messages if you receive them.
>
> Other conferences to promote coverage at?
>
>     JB: In the past when we have discussed conferences, we have
>     talked about reaching out to other conferences. Are there
>     others that people suggest?
>     ... are there non-a11y confereneces we should be bringing a11y
>     into?
>
>     Tzviya: There is an annual conference IAnnotate on annotation
>     and making them accessible. We could look at that for next
>     year.
>     ... this year in Silicon Valley, last year in Germany
>
>     <tzviya> [20]http://iannotate.org/
>
>       [20] http://iannotate.org/
>
>     Shadi: Kim Patch is attending that conference. I was contacted
>     by Doug Scheppers. I connected him with Kim Patch. If it is in
>     Germany next year, I would be interested in attending
>
>     SAZ: Two weeks ago I spoke at STC, Society for Technical
>     Communications. It is about writing technical documentation and
>     manuals. They are looking at aspects of augmented reality and
>     virtual reality
>     ... they are rather accessibility aware. They used to have an
>     active accessibility group, but less active now.
>     ... the crossover to virtual and augmented reality
>     accessibility could be worthwhile.
>
> Accessibility-outreach-related community groups, EOWG connection?
> (Not in APA scope) [21]https://www.w3.org/community/groups/
>
>       [21] https://www.w3.org/community/groups/
>
>     JB: This is a follow-up from the last meeting. There is no one
>     from EOWG attending this call today.
>     ... I will see if I can get a response from EO by email
>
> "Verticals" report/visit?
>
>     <Judy> ACTION: Judy follow up with EOWG by email about
>     Accessibility CGs in cc to WAI CC
>
>     <trackbot> Created ACTION-7 - Follow up with eowg by email
>     about accessibility cgs in cc to wai cc [on Judy Brewer - due
>     2018-06-13].
>
>     JB: We had a discussion several months ago about reaching out
>     to verticals. I attended an APA meeting.
>     ... the impression I came away with was that it was difficult
>     to have a conversation about outreach to verticals given what
>     APA already has on their plate and lack of communication
>     channels between them
>     ... I wanted to see if Jeff Jaffe could speak with this group
>     or with APA
>     ... the slide deck that he has been using for explaining
>     outreach to verticals.
>
>     JSa: We need to identify people with expertise in the vertical
>     that can attract the vertical interest
>     ... important to identify who is active and who is more
>     conjectural
>
>     JB: Maybe the discussion on the technical aspects could have
>     with that.
>     ... which is why I htought it might be helpful to have the
>     technical discussion in APA, have the technical discussion and
>     discover what stage they are at and whether it would be helpful
>     to have the accessibility discussion at that stage.
>
>     JSa: I think the possibility of being helpful is worth it.
>
>     JB: With regard to Silver, would this be helpful?
>
>     JSp: I would be interested in regard to Silver scoping
>
>     JB: Would any of this be of interest to people on IRC or other
>     areas of people on this call?
>
>     JSa: I want to have a conversation about the intersection of
>     publishing and media
>
>     Tzviya: Once there is progress on the work that Marissa is
>     doing, she would like to connect.
>
>     JSa: She is on my list to talk with, too.
>
>     JB: I would want to have someone interested in the industry
>     verticals to participate as well. I'm inclined to do this as a
>     half hour of an hour on this call.
>
>     JSa: That would include the broader swath than just APA
>     ... there is a slide on media, are they aware of MAUR?
>
>     JB: This may be further out in June
>     ... depending on Jeff's travel schedule
>
> Call scheduling questions...
>
>     JB: Several people have joined the call since the earlier
>     discussion.
>     ... Tzviya has asked that this call be just an hour
>     ... can I ask about the 3:00-4:00 time slot?
>
>     <jamesn> +1 to 3-4
>
>     <janina> As good as current
>
>     <tzviya> +1 for 3 -4
>
>     JSp: as good/bad as current
>
>     AWK: Better for me
>
>     <joanie> Better when I'm in U.S.
>
>     Shadi: This is 8:30-9:30PM for me
>
>     JB: Are there any ET morning times that would work?
>
>     <janina> 1400UTC
>
>     <janina> OK for me, but probably not Pacific like James
>
>     JSp: Wed, Thurs, or Fri at 10:00AM work for me.
>
>     <jamesn> -1 to 10am Boston
>
>     <jamesn> hard no for me
>
>     <janina> Monday, Wednesday
>
>     <tzviya> mornings are hard
>
>     JB: We will continue with our current call
>
> Summary of Action Items
>
>     [NEW] ACTION: Judy check calendar and try to offer alternate
>     times
>     [NEW] ACTION: Judy follow up with EOWG by email about
>     Accessibility CGs in cc to WAI CC
>
> Summary of Resolutions
>
>     [End of minutes]
>
>
>
>