- From: Michael Stenitzer <stenitzer@wienfluss.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:41:38 +0200
- To: Andrew Arch <andrew@w3.org>
- CC: public-wai-age@w3.org
hi andrew, good work! just a few minor notes: * for public funded / subsidized or common profit websites accessibility might be a strong argument. [social and / or legal factors depending on the legislation] * active participation of older people / people with disabilites in the community might be an argument. [social factors] * Reduce Server Load: first its reducion of *relative* server load (per page delivered). in our experience largely improved web sites generate a lot more traffic (page views) due to better findability, but reduce bandwith per page delivered (and rather not the server load, as this is more dependent on the server side logic and the number of page requests than the page size nowadays). hope that helps, michael Andrew Arch wrote: > > Hello all, > > As discussed during previous teleconferences, I have now updated the the > documents for "Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your > Organization" to add additional examples and discussion regarding older > users, and to add WCAG 2.0 references: > - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/Overview.html > - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/soc.html > - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/tech.html > - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/fin.html > - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/pol.html > > The changelog has also been updated: > - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-bcase-update.html > > Please read these documents to see if we have sufficiently covered > examples and issues that specifically relate to older people. Please > send any comments or suggestions to the list for discussion and > consideration. > > Regards, Andrew -- Michael Stenitzer | WIENFLUSS information.design.solutions www.wienfluss.net | proschkogasse 1/5 | vienna AT fon ++43 650 9358770 | fax ++43 1 23680199
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2008 12:42:13 UTC