- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 14:47:19 -0700
- To: W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
PLEASE STUDY 5,6,7 BEFORE the meeting Webex at <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-w3process/2019May/0000.html> IRC is #w3process Log of prior meeting at <https://www.w3.org/2021/04/14-w3process-minutes.html> Usual meeting time: SECOND and FOURTH WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH AT 7AM PACIFIC. See <https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/w3process/calendar> Overall purpose: Identify what needs doing to close down P-2021 1) Assign scribe, etc., 2) Agenda bash. 3) Status reports 3.1) PSIG Report. Do we need PP protection on Registry Definitions? Tooling considerations? Other take-aways from PSIG? 3.2) Editor report: what’s holding us back from sending to the AB so they can send it to the team and the AC? 3.3) I don’t see any non-agenda+ recent Issues that should be triaged <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2021-03-10+-label%3AAgenda%2B> 4) Agenda+ 4.1) Agenda+ to close, should be quick; bulk approval, please check in advance. Rules on where deliverables are developed: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/322 Are all WDs on the Rec Track: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/236 Who publishes Technical Reports?: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/351 allow public review comments and public visibility of AC review comments: <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/38> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/63> handled via <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/526> 4.2) Pull Requests <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+label%3AAgenda%2B+type%3Apr> Several pull requests at time of writing. 4.3) Issues <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3AAgenda%2B+type%3Aissue> Several issues at the time of writing. I’d like to be crisp. 5) Check of issues raised by the AC on the last update. All the ones I think we should address are on the Agenda+ list. Does ANYONE see an issue in <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3AAC-review+type%3Aissue+-label%3AAgenda%2B> that we should address? 6) Check P2021 Milestone. <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2021%22+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-label%3A%22AC-review%22> I am concerned that we maybe should land: * what are substantive changes to a charter: <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/28> * abandoning a note?: <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/50> Does anyone want to raise anything else as potentially to land in P2021? 7) Editorial: * reorganize as suggested in <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2021Apr/0001.html> should we re-organize into a more rational overall structure? Generally, * put all Groups into one chapter: constitutional (AC, AB, TAG) and chartered * put all Products into one chapter: Recommendations, Notes and Statements, Registries Tidy up otherwise (including the notorious clause 4) The usual closers: 8) Next meeting. 28 April but the chair may have trouble that week. 8) Any other business. Dave Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple singer@apple.com
Received on Monday, 10 May 2021 21:47:37 UTC