- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 14:47:19 -0700
- To: W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
PLEASE STUDY 5,6,7 BEFORE the meeting
Webex at <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-w3process/2019May/0000.html>
IRC is #w3process
Log of prior meeting at <https://www.w3.org/2021/04/14-w3process-minutes.html>
Usual meeting time: SECOND and FOURTH WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH AT 7AM PACIFIC. See <https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/w3process/calendar>
Overall purpose: Identify what needs doing to close down P-2021
1) Assign scribe, etc.,
2) Agenda bash.
3) Status reports
3.1) PSIG Report. Do we need PP protection on Registry Definitions? Tooling considerations? Other take-aways from PSIG?
3.2) Editor report: what’s holding us back from sending to the AB so they can send it to the team and the AC?
3.3) I don’t see any non-agenda+ recent Issues that should be triaged <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2021-03-10+-label%3AAgenda%2B>
4) Agenda+
4.1) Agenda+ to close, should be quick; bulk approval, please check in advance.
Rules on where deliverables are developed: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/322
Are all WDs on the Rec Track: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/236
Who publishes Technical Reports?: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/351
allow public review comments and public visibility of AC review comments:
<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/38>
<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/63>
handled via <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/526>
4.2) Pull Requests <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+label%3AAgenda%2B+type%3Apr>
Several pull requests at time of writing.
4.3) Issues <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3AAgenda%2B+type%3Aissue>
Several issues at the time of writing. I’d like to be crisp.
5) Check of issues raised by the AC on the last update. All the ones I think we should address are on the Agenda+ list. Does ANYONE see an issue in
<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3AAC-review+type%3Aissue+-label%3AAgenda%2B>
that we should address?
6) Check P2021 Milestone. <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2021%22+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-label%3A%22AC-review%22>
I am concerned that we maybe should land:
* what are substantive changes to a charter: <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/28>
* abandoning a note?: <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/50>
Does anyone want to raise anything else as potentially to land in P2021?
7) Editorial:
* reorganize as suggested in <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2021Apr/0001.html>
should we re-organize into a more rational overall structure?
Generally,
* put all Groups into one chapter: constitutional (AC, AB, TAG) and chartered
* put all Products into one chapter: Recommendations, Notes and Statements, Registries
Tidy up otherwise (including the notorious clause 4)
The usual closers:
8) Next meeting. 28 April but the chair may have trouble that week.
8) Any other business.
Dave Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple
singer@apple.com
Received on Monday, 10 May 2021 21:47:37 UTC