- From: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:01:50 -0400
- To: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Hi Process CG, You asked for an update on the implementation of more specific response to charter review comments, Issue 182: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182 Over the last 12 months, we have opened 22 charter reviews for Working Groups or Interest Groups, of which 17 have closed. Objections or proposed changes (with or without objection) were raised in 12 of them, of which 2 are still pending resolution. In six instances, we sent notice to the reviewers and member-charters-review[1] of proposed changes to the charter from the reviewed draft, and requested response if the revision would alter a reviewer's vote. In those cases, no reviewer objected to the revised charter. In other instances, the team made non-substantive changes, such as fixing an erroneous deliverable due date. or did not adopt suggested changes. The announcement messages include a disposition of comments.[2] Hope this is helpful, --Wendy [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-charters-review/ [2] <https://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Member/search?keywords=&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=Charter+Approved&index-grp=Member__FULL+Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=w3c-ac-members> -- Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office) Strategy Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) https://wendy.seltzer.org/ +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2019 15:01:52 UTC