Re: Issue 182: Addressing comments in charter review

super helpful, thanks

yes, we realized it’s been a while we’ve been running this practice, and wanted to know how it’s working out. Thanks.

> On Sep 11, 2019, at 8:01 , Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Process CG,
> 
> You asked for an update on the implementation of more specific response
> to charter review comments, Issue 182:
> https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182
> 
> Over the last 12 months, we have opened 22 charter reviews for Working
> Groups or Interest Groups, of which 17 have closed. Objections or
> proposed changes (with or without objection) were raised in 12 of them,
> of which 2 are still pending resolution.
> 
> In six instances, we sent notice to the reviewers and
> member-charters-review[1] of proposed changes to the charter from the
> reviewed draft, and requested response if the revision would alter a
> reviewer's vote. In those cases, no reviewer objected to the revised
> charter. In other instances, the team made non-substantive changes, such
> as fixing an erroneous deliverable due date. or did not adopt suggested
> changes. The announcement messages include a disposition of comments.[2]
> 
> Hope this is helpful,
> --Wendy
> 
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-charters-review/
> [2]
> <https://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Member/search?keywords=&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=Charter+Approved&index-grp=Member__FULL+Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=w3c-ac-members>
> -- 
> Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office)
> Strategy Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
> https://wendy.seltzer.org/        +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
> 
> 

David Singer

singer@mac.com

Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2019 19:17:49 UTC