Re: DRAFT-1 agenda for the Process Call Wednesday 23rd Oct 7am PDT, REPLY APPRECIATED

I expect to be on this call.

Jeff

On 10/22/2019 2:30 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> +Tantek Çelik <mailto:tantek@cs.stanford.edu>  since he's mentioned.
>
> I will make the call if it happens.
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:13 AM David Singer <singer@apple.com 
> <mailto:singer@apple.com>> wrote:
>
>     I am in Korea, and Philippe is in China. It’ll be 11pm for me. I
>     hope I make it.
>
>     **** If know you can and would make it, or conversely can’t and
>     won’t, please reply and confirm or regret; we can asses then
>     whether we’ll have a productive call. Thanks. ****
>
>
>
>
>     Webex at
>     <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-w3process/2019May/0000.html>
>
>     IRC is #w3process
>
>     Log of prior meeting at
>     <https://www.w3.org/2019/09/11-w3process-minutes.html>
>
>
>     Usual meeting time: SECOND and FOURTH WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH AT
>     7AM PACIFIC
>
>
>
>     1) Assign scribe, etc.,
>
>     2) Registries and Living Standards.
>
>     2.1) Tantek raised a Registry issue at TPAC, which I hd previously
>     raised and then dropped in the interests of making progress. he
>     has not (yet) filed it as an issue. Update from the chair (me).
>
>     2.2) Update on where we are with Living Standards?
>     PLH/Jeff/Elika/someone?
>
>
>     3) Editorials, and (Other) Pull Requests and Issues tagged Agenda+
>
>     3.1) Pull Requests:
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3AAgenda%2B>
>
>     Make it clear than any decision can be objected to
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/299>
>     [Registries handled above]
>
>     3.2) Issues:           
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AAgenda%2B+
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AAgenda%2B+>>
>
>     New, need to decide how to proceed: add references to "Open Stand"
>     principles #325 <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/325>
>
>     3.3) Editorials: we still need to make progress on the meaning of
>     Discontinued, and clearer wording for transitions to
>     superseded/obsolete. They are not tagged agenda+
>
>     What does the document status "discontinued" mean? #262
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/262>
>       — we discussed before
>     provide clearer/common wording for transitions to
>     Obsolete/Superseded status
>     #141<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/141>
>      — Chris Wilson update?
>
>     4) Review of 2020 milestone; who has the action, where are we
>     going, what’s next? Do we expect/hope/intend to finish these in
>     P2020 or should we start slipping them?
>
>     4.1) assigned to someone, please be prepared to give any needed
>     updates (briefly), or if you are blocked by something, explain
>     what it is so we can unblock you:
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+assignee%3A*
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+assignee%3A*>>
>
>     I think we need to decide what the plan is on:
>
>     Substantive changes undefined for Charter and Process reviews
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/28>
>     Define charter review process to require addressing comments as in
>     CR transitions <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182>
>
>
>     4.2) unassigned; none.
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+no%3Aassignee+
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+no%3Aassignee+>>
>
>     5) new issues and updates.
>
>     5.1) new since prior check:
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+>>
>     There are many; I don’t intend to list them here.
>
>     If we reduce to those not either (a) evergreen or (b)
>     director-free, and not (c) Agenda+, we have 9:
>            
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-label%3Adirector-free+
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-label%3Adirector-free+>>
>
>     It’s time to triage them. I’d like to draw particular attention to:
>
>     Recording of meetings <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/334>
>     TAG and AB should be able to formally review charters
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/328>
>     Community and Business Groups
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/326>
>     Do we need a lighter-weight process for superseding when it's
>     "obvious”? <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/324>
>
>     I’d like to encourage people to review them, and tag Agenda+ any
>     that we could progress, or dispose of. Please?
>
>
>     5.2) updated but not any of:
>             Process2020 milestone
>             nor Evergreen
>             nor director-free
>             nor Agenda+
>             not assigned to the AB (Needs AB Feedback)
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+updated%3A%3E2019-05-22+-label%3A%22Needs+AB+Feedback%22+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3Adirector-free+
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+updated%3A%3E2019-05-22+-label%3A%22Needs+AB+Feedback%22+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3Adirector-free+>>
>
>     I’d like to encourage people to review them, and tag Agenda+ any
>     that we could progress, or dispose of. Please?
>
>
>     6) If we have time, Assigned, but not on the 2020 milestone
>     (cherry-pick, if people have updates or questions for us):
>
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+assignee%3A*+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22
>     <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+assignee%3A*+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22>>
>
>     Some of these date from 2017. Surely time to clean out?
>
>     The usual closers:
>
>     7) Next meeting. formally Wed Sept 25th, week after TPAC. I assume
>     we’ll meet and de-brief.
>
>     8) Any other business.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     David Singer
>     Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2019 23:42:12 UTC