- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 19:41:49 -0400
- To: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@mozilla.com>
- Cc: W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <af31e68e-a49f-aea9-f56a-af11329bcd36@w3.org>
I expect to be on this call. Jeff On 10/22/2019 2:30 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > +Tantek Çelik <mailto:tantek@cs.stanford.edu> since he's mentioned. > > I will make the call if it happens. > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:13 AM David Singer <singer@apple.com > <mailto:singer@apple.com>> wrote: > > I am in Korea, and Philippe is in China. It’ll be 11pm for me. I > hope I make it. > > **** If know you can and would make it, or conversely can’t and > won’t, please reply and confirm or regret; we can asses then > whether we’ll have a productive call. Thanks. **** > > > > > Webex at > <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-w3process/2019May/0000.html> > > IRC is #w3process > > Log of prior meeting at > <https://www.w3.org/2019/09/11-w3process-minutes.html> > > > Usual meeting time: SECOND and FOURTH WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH AT > 7AM PACIFIC > > > > 1) Assign scribe, etc., > > 2) Registries and Living Standards. > > 2.1) Tantek raised a Registry issue at TPAC, which I hd previously > raised and then dropped in the interests of making progress. he > has not (yet) filed it as an issue. Update from the chair (me). > > 2.2) Update on where we are with Living Standards? > PLH/Jeff/Elika/someone? > > > 3) Editorials, and (Other) Pull Requests and Issues tagged Agenda+ > > 3.1) Pull Requests: > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3AAgenda%2B> > > Make it clear than any decision can be objected to > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/299> > [Registries handled above] > > 3.2) Issues: > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AAgenda%2B+ > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AAgenda%2B+>> > > New, need to decide how to proceed: add references to "Open Stand" > principles #325 <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/325> > > 3.3) Editorials: we still need to make progress on the meaning of > Discontinued, and clearer wording for transitions to > superseded/obsolete. They are not tagged agenda+ > > What does the document status "discontinued" mean? #262 > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/262> > — we discussed before > provide clearer/common wording for transitions to > Obsolete/Superseded status > #141<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/141> > — Chris Wilson update? > > 4) Review of 2020 milestone; who has the action, where are we > going, what’s next? Do we expect/hope/intend to finish these in > P2020 or should we start slipping them? > > 4.1) assigned to someone, please be prepared to give any needed > updates (briefly), or if you are blocked by something, explain > what it is so we can unblock you: > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+assignee%3A* > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+assignee%3A*>> > > I think we need to decide what the plan is on: > > Substantive changes undefined for Charter and Process reviews > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/28> > Define charter review process to require addressing comments as in > CR transitions <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182> > > > 4.2) unassigned; none. > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+no%3Aassignee+ > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+no%3Aassignee+>> > > 5) new issues and updates. > > 5.1) new since prior check: > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+ > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+>> > There are many; I don’t intend to list them here. > > If we reduce to those not either (a) evergreen or (b) > director-free, and not (c) Agenda+, we have 9: > > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-label%3Adirector-free+ > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-label%3Adirector-free+>> > > It’s time to triage them. I’d like to draw particular attention to: > > Recording of meetings <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/334> > TAG and AB should be able to formally review charters > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/328> > Community and Business Groups > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/326> > Do we need a lighter-weight process for superseding when it's > "obvious”? <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/324> > > I’d like to encourage people to review them, and tag Agenda+ any > that we could progress, or dispose of. Please? > > > 5.2) updated but not any of: > Process2020 milestone > nor Evergreen > nor director-free > nor Agenda+ > not assigned to the AB (Needs AB Feedback) > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+updated%3A%3E2019-05-22+-label%3A%22Needs+AB+Feedback%22+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3Adirector-free+ > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+updated%3A%3E2019-05-22+-label%3A%22Needs+AB+Feedback%22+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3Adirector-free+>> > > I’d like to encourage people to review them, and tag Agenda+ any > that we could progress, or dispose of. Please? > > > 6) If we have time, Assigned, but not on the 2020 milestone > (cherry-pick, if people have updates or questions for us): > > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+assignee%3A*+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22 > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+assignee%3A*+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22>> > > Some of these date from 2017. Surely time to clean out? > > The usual closers: > > 7) Next meeting. formally Wed Sept 25th, week after TPAC. I assume > we’ll meet and de-brief. > > 8) Any other business. > > > > > > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2019 23:42:12 UTC