- From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@tetralogical.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:34:01 +0100
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@mozilla.com>
- Cc: W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
I plan to be on the call. On 23/10/2019 00:41, Jeff Jaffe wrote: > I expect to be on this call. > > Jeff > > On 10/22/2019 2:30 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: >> +Tantek Çelik <mailto:tantek@cs.stanford.edu> since he's mentioned. >> >> I will make the call if it happens. >> >> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:13 AM David Singer <singer@apple.com >> <mailto:singer@apple.com>> wrote: >> >> I am in Korea, and Philippe is in China. It’ll be 11pm for me. I >> hope I make it. >> >> **** If know you can and would make it, or conversely can’t and >> won’t, please reply and confirm or regret; we can asses then >> whether we’ll have a productive call. Thanks. **** >> >> >> >> >> Webex at >> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-w3process/2019May/0000.html> >> >> IRC is #w3process >> >> Log of prior meeting at >> <https://www.w3.org/2019/09/11-w3process-minutes.html> >> >> >> Usual meeting time: SECOND and FOURTH WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH AT >> 7AM PACIFIC >> >> >> >> 1) Assign scribe, etc., >> >> 2) Registries and Living Standards. >> >> 2.1) Tantek raised a Registry issue at TPAC, which I hd previously >> raised and then dropped in the interests of making progress. he >> has not (yet) filed it as an issue. Update from the chair (me). >> >> 2.2) Update on where we are with Living Standards? >> PLH/Jeff/Elika/someone? >> >> >> 3) Editorials, and (Other) Pull Requests and Issues tagged Agenda+ >> >> 3.1) Pull Requests: >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3AAgenda%2B> >> >> Make it clear than any decision can be objected to >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/299> >> [Registries handled above] >> >> 3.2) Issues: >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AAgenda%2B+ >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AAgenda%2B+>> >> >> New, need to decide how to proceed: add references to "Open Stand" >> principles #325 <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/325> >> >> 3.3) Editorials: we still need to make progress on the meaning of >> Discontinued, and clearer wording for transitions to >> superseded/obsolete. They are not tagged agenda+ >> >> What does the document status "discontinued" mean? #262 >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/262> >> — we discussed before >> provide clearer/common wording for transitions to >> Obsolete/Superseded status >> #141<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/141> >> — Chris Wilson update? >> >> 4) Review of 2020 milestone; who has the action, where are we >> going, what’s next? Do we expect/hope/intend to finish these in >> P2020 or should we start slipping them? >> >> 4.1) assigned to someone, please be prepared to give any needed >> updates (briefly), or if you are blocked by something, explain >> what it is so we can unblock you: >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+assignee%3A* >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+assignee%3A*>> >> >> I think we need to decide what the plan is on: >> >> Substantive changes undefined for Charter and Process reviews >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/28> >> Define charter review process to require addressing comments as in >> CR transitions <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182> >> >> >> 4.2) unassigned; none. >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+no%3Aassignee+ >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+no%3Aassignee+>> >> >> 5) new issues and updates. >> >> 5.1) new since prior check: >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+ >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+>> >> There are many; I don’t intend to list them here. >> >> If we reduce to those not either (a) evergreen or (b) >> director-free, and not (c) Agenda+, we have 9: >> >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-label%3Adirector-free+ >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-label%3Adirector-free+>> >> >> It’s time to triage them. I’d like to draw particular attention to: >> >> Recording of meetings <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/334> >> TAG and AB should be able to formally review charters >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/328> >> Community and Business Groups >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/326> >> Do we need a lighter-weight process for superseding when it's >> "obvious”? <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/324> >> >> I’d like to encourage people to review them, and tag Agenda+ any >> that we could progress, or dispose of. Please? >> >> >> 5.2) updated but not any of: >> Process2020 milestone >> nor Evergreen >> nor director-free >> nor Agenda+ >> not assigned to the AB (Needs AB Feedback) >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+updated%3A%3E2019-05-22+-label%3A%22Needs+AB+Feedback%22+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3Adirector-free+ >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+updated%3A%3E2019-05-22+-label%3A%22Needs+AB+Feedback%22+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3Adirector-free+>> >> >> I’d like to encourage people to review them, and tag Agenda+ any >> that we could progress, or dispose of. Please? >> >> >> 6) If we have time, Assigned, but not on the 2020 milestone >> (cherry-pick, if people have updates or questions for us): >> >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+assignee%3A*+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22 >> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+assignee%3A*+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22>> >> >> Some of these date from 2017. Surely time to clean out? >> >> The usual closers: >> >> 7) Next meeting. formally Wed Sept 25th, week after TPAC. I assume >> we’ll meet and de-brief. >> >> 8) Any other business. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> David Singer >> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >> >> >> >> >> -- Director @TetraLogical
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2019 07:56:30 UTC