Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: W3C process call, 27 November

So far, the only positive response, Michael was from you.  I'm happy to 
chat with you (and anyone else who joins) a bit if you would like.  LMK.

On 11/26/2019 12:57 PM, Michael Champion wrote:
>
> > Note that David just sent a "no call November 26th" mail.  :)
>
> Right, but Jeff sent a message 
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2019Nov/0031.html 
> offering to host an INFORMAL discussion of what the AB recommends to 
> do with the Everteal proposal, and a timeline to get a process update 
> completed by June.
>
> Given how few people there are who participate in the Process CG but 
> aren’t on the AB, I’m not sure such a call will be well-attended, but 
> I’ll dial in if it happens.  Or it might be more efficient to have W3M 
> update the handful of non-AB participants by email or GitHub.
>
> *From: *Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, November 26, 2019 at 9:48 AM
> *To: *Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
> *Cc: *Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, 
> public-w3process@w3.org <public-w3process@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: W3C process call, 27 November
>
> Note that David just sent a "no call November 26th" mail.  :)
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 9:33 AM Michael Champion 
> <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com 
> <mailto:Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks for the whiteboard picture!  I’m curious about a few things:
>
>     - What are the major changes  to the Everteal flow since the
>     presentations at TPAC?
>
>     - Can Everteal create a plausible “living standard” option without
>     patent policy changes?
>
>     - If not, what’s the W3M/AB plan to get a patent policy update in
>     6 months?  Does it seems feasible for the “living standard”
>     aspects of Everteal to reference an experimental patent policy but
>     improvements to facilitate well-maintained Recommendations
>     reference the existing patent policy?
>
>     *From: *Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org <mailto:plh@w3.org>>
>     *Date: *Tuesday, November 26, 2019 at 5:41 AM
>     *To: *Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org <mailto:jeff@w3.org>>,
>     public-w3process@w3.org <mailto:public-w3process@w3.org>
>     <public-w3process@w3.org <mailto:public-w3process@w3.org>>
>     *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: W3C process call, 27 November
>
>     I'm available.
>
>     fyi, I'll do a call with the team contacts on December 12 to
>     ensure that
>     they are up-to-speed with EverTeal and gets their feedback on how it
>     gets presented.
>
>     Following the AB session last week, I drew the following on my board:
>     https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F12%2Feverteal-whiteboard.jpg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cmichael.champion%40microsoft.com%7Cdae75665059442f75aa808d7727647b3%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637103724649132155&amp;sdata=%2BC2YzaWiw7ieqSa%2BD3guLicGiM15osDbHbFj0UWFOk8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F12%2Feverteal-whiteboard.jpg&data=02%7C01%7Cmichael.champion%40microsoft.com%7C3d9dfd023d5842674d7908d77298c4db%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637103872785151805&sdata=%2F6YRmzdwbjudPbG%2FJSFs1LnKba2BLC5fAZWOQaQOh1Y%3D&reserved=0>
>
>     Philippe
>
>     On 11/25/2019 10:02 PM, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
>     > My calendar shows a W3C process call this week, but I know that our
>     > Chair - David Singer is on vacation this week. I suspect many
>     other US
>     > participants are also out on Wednesday.  On the other hand, I
>     have not
>     > seen a cancellation notice.
>     >
>     > I suggest that we not have a formal agenda going through all of the
>     > issues that David always prepares for us.  But if people are
>     interested,
>     > I would not mind having an informal meeting. Two useful things to
>     > discuss are:
>     >
>     >   * A summary of the AB's discussion last week about Continuous
>     >     Development, the Patent Policy, Registries, and Process 2020.
>     >   * A discussion of a possible timetable to get Process 2020 to AC
>     >     review by March, and AC approval by June.
>     >
>     > LMK what people think about such a call.
>     >
>     > Jeff
>     >
>     >
>