Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: W3C process call, 27 November

> Note that David just sent a "no call November 26th" mail.  :)

Right, but Jeff sent a message https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2019Nov/0031.html offering to host an INFORMAL discussion of what the AB recommends to do with the Everteal proposal, and a timeline to get a process update completed by June.

Given how few people there are who participate in the Process CG but aren’t on the AB, I’m not sure such a call will be well-attended, but I’ll dial in if it happens.  Or it might be more efficient to have W3M update the handful of non-AB participants by email or GitHub.

From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 at 9:48 AM
To: Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
Cc: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, public-w3process@w3.org <public-w3process@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: W3C process call, 27 November
Note that David just sent a "no call November 26th" mail.  :)

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 9:33 AM Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com<mailto:Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Thanks for the whiteboard picture!  I’m curious about a few things:

- What are the major changes  to the Everteal flow since the presentations at TPAC?

- Can Everteal create a plausible “living standard” option without patent policy changes?

- If not, what’s the W3M/AB plan to get a patent policy update in 6 months?  Does it seems feasible for the “living standard” aspects of Everteal to reference an experimental patent policy but improvements to facilitate well-maintained Recommendations reference the existing patent policy?




From: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>
Date: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 at 5:41 AM
To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org<mailto:jeff@w3.org>>, public-w3process@w3.org<mailto:public-w3process@w3.org> <public-w3process@w3.org<mailto:public-w3process@w3.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: W3C process call, 27 November
I'm available.

fyi, I'll do a call with the team contacts on December 12 to ensure that
they are up-to-speed with EverTeal and gets their feedback on how it
gets presented.

Following the AB session last week, I drew the following on my board:
  https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F12%2Feverteal-whiteboard.jpg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cmichael.champion%40microsoft.com%7Cdae75665059442f75aa808d7727647b3%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637103724649132155&amp;sdata=%2BC2YzaWiw7ieqSa%2BD3guLicGiM15osDbHbFj0UWFOk8%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F12%2Feverteal-whiteboard.jpg&data=02%7C01%7Cmichael.champion%40microsoft.com%7C3d9dfd023d5842674d7908d77298c4db%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637103872785151805&sdata=%2F6YRmzdwbjudPbG%2FJSFs1LnKba2BLC5fAZWOQaQOh1Y%3D&reserved=0>

Philippe

On 11/25/2019 10:02 PM, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
> My calendar shows a W3C process call this week, but I know that our
> Chair - David Singer is on vacation this week.  I suspect many other US
> participants are also out on Wednesday.  On the other hand, I have not
> seen a cancellation notice.
>
> I suggest that we not have a formal agenda going through all of the
> issues that David always prepares for us.  But if people are interested,
> I would not mind having an informal meeting.  Two useful things to
> discuss are:
>
>   * A summary of the AB's discussion last week about Continuous
>     Development, the Patent Policy, Registries, and Process 2020.
>   * A discussion of a possible timetable to get Process 2020 to AC
>     review by March, and AC approval by June.
>
> LMK what people think about such a call.
>
> Jeff
>
>